IngentaConnect Neural Plasticity and Consciousness

Authors: Hurley S.¹; Noë A.²

Source: Biology and Philosophy, Volume 18, Number 1, January 2003 , pp. 131-168(38)

Publisher: Springer

Abstract:

We introduce a distinction between cortical dominance and cortical deference, and apply it to various examples of neural plasticity in which input is rerouted intermodally or intramodally to nonstandard cortical targets. In some cases but not others, cortical activity `defers' to the nonstandard sources of input. We ask why, consider some possible explanations, and propose a dynamic sensorimotor hypothesis. We believe that this distinction is important and worthy of further study, both philosophical and empirical, whether or not our hypothesis turns out to be correct. In particular, the question of how the distinction should be explained is linked to explanatory gap issues for consciousness. Comparative and absolute explanatory gaps should be distinguished: why does neural activity in a particular area of cortex have this qualitative expression rather than that, and why does it have any qualitative expression at all? We use the dominance/deference distinction to address the comparative gaps, both intermodal and intramodal (not the absolute gap). We do so not by inward scrutiny but rather by expanding our gaze to include relations between brain, body and environment.

Keywords: consciousness; cortical deference; cortical dominance; dynamic sensorimotor contingencies; explanatory gaps; neural plasticity; perceptual adaptation; phantom limbs; synaesthesia

Language: English

Document Type: Research article

Affiliations: 1: PAIS, University of Warwick, Coventry CV4 7AL, U.K., E-mail: s.l.hurley@warwick.ac.uk 2: Department of Philosophy, University of California, Santa Cruz, U.S.A. E-mail: anoe@cats.ucsc.edu

The full text electronic article is available for purchase. You will be able to download the full text electronic article after payment.

$47.00 plus tax Refund Policy