The Advantages of Theft over Toil: The Design Inference and Arguing from Ignorance

Authors: Wilkins J.S.1; Elsberry W.R.2

Source: Biology and Philosophy, Volume 16, Number 5, November 2001 , pp. 709-722(14)

Publisher: Springer

Key:
Free Content - Free Content
New Content - New Content
Subscribed Content - Subscribed Content
Free Trial Content - Free Trial Content

Abstract:

Intelligent design theorist William Dembski has proposed an ``explanatory filter'' for distinguishing between events due to chance, lawful regularity or design. We show that if Dembski's filter were adopted as a scientific heuristic, some classical developments in science would not be rational, and that Dembski's assertion that the filter reliably identifies rarefied design requires ignoring the state of background knowledge. If background information changes even slightly, the filter's conclusion will vary wildly. Dembski fails to overcome Hume's objections to arguments from design.

Keywords: Bayesian inference; Darwin; Dembski; intelligent design; natural selection

Language: English

Document Type: Regular paper

Affiliations: 1: History and Philosophy of Science, The University of Melbourne, PO Box 542, Somerville 3912, Australia E-mail: wilkins@wehi.edu.au 2: Department of Wildlife and Fisheries Sciences, Texas A&M University, 3027 Macaulay Street, San Diego, CA 92106, USA E-mail: welsberr@inia.cls.org

The full text electronic article is available for purchase. You will be able to download the full text electronic article after payment.

$47.00 plus tax      Refund Policy

 

OR

Back to top

Key:
Free Content - Free Content
New Content - New Content
Subscribed Content - Subscribed Content
Free Trial Content - Free Trial Content
Share this item with others: These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages.
Page Help Click here for Page Help
Shopping cart
Tools
Sign in






Need to register?
Sign up here
Text size: A | A | A | A