Argument construction and reinstatement in logics for defeasible reasoning

Author: Horty J.F.1

Source: Artificial Intelligence and Law, Volume 9, Number 1, March 2001 , pp. 1-28(28)

Publisher: Springer

Purchase options

The full text electronic article is available for purchase. You will be able to download the full text electronic article after payment.

$47.00 plus tax      Refund Policy

OR

 
More like this?
Content Key:
Free Content - Free
New Content - New
Open Access Content - Open Access
Subscribed Content - Subscribed
Free Trial Content - Free Trial

Abstract:

This paper points out some problems with two recent logical systems – one due to Prakken and Sartor, the other due to Kowalski and Toni – designed for the representation of defeasible arguments in general, but with a special emphasis on legal reasoning.

Language: English

Document Type: Regular paper

Affiliations: 1: Philosophy Department and Institute for Advanced Computer Studies, University of Maryland, College Park, MD 20742, U.S.A. E-mail: horty@umiacs.umd.edu, http://www.umiacs.umd.edu/users/horty

Back to top

Content Key:
Free Content - Free
New Content - New
Open Access Content - Open Access
Subscribed Content - Subscribed
Free Trial Content - Free Trial
Share this item with others: These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages.
Page Help Click here for Page Help
Shopping cart
Tools
Sign in
Need to register?
Sign up here
Text size: A | A | A | A