Legal reasoning with subjective logic

Authors: Jøsang, Audun¹; Bondi, Viggo²

Source: Artificial Intelligence and Law, Volume 8, Number 4, December 2000 , pp. 289-315(27)

Publisher: Springer

Buy & download fulltext article:

Price: $47.00 plus tax (Refund Policy)

Abstract:

Judges and jurors must make decisions in an environment of ignoranceand uncertainty for example by hearing statements of possibly unreliable ordishonest witnesses, assessing possibly doubtful or irrelevantevidence, and enduring attempts by the opponents to manipulate thejudge's and the jurors' perceptions and feelings. Three importantaspects of decision making in this environment are the quantificationof sufficient proof, the weighing of pieces of evidence, and therelevancy of evidence. This paper proposes a mathematical frameworkfor dealing with the two first aspects, namely the quantification ofproof and weighing of evidence. Our approach is based on subjectivelogic, which is an extension of standard logic and probability theory,in which the notion of probability is extended by including degrees ofuncertainty. Subjective Logic is a framework for modelling humanreasoning and we show how it can be applied to legalreasoning.

Keywords: artificial; belief; court; law; probability; reasoning; uncertainty

Document Type: Research article

DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1023/A:1011219731903

Affiliations: 1: Distributed Systems Technology Centre, Brisbane, Australia, Email: ajosang@dstc.edu.au 2: Norwegian Shipowners' Association, Oslo, Norway, Email: viggo.bondi@rederi.no

Publication date: 2000-12-01