EEG Signature and Phenomenology of Alpha/theta Neurofeedback Training Versus Mock Feedback

Authors: Egner T.1; Strawson E.2; Gruzelier J.H.2

Source: Applied Psychophysiology and Biofeedback, Volume 27, Number 4, December 2002 , pp. 261-270(10)

Publisher: Springer

Buy & download fulltext article:

OR

Price: $47.00 plus tax (Refund Policy)

Abstract:

Alpha/theta (a/t) neurofeedback training has in the past successfully been used as a complementary therapeutic relaxation technique in the treatment of alcoholism. In spite of positive clinical outcomes, doubts have been cast on the protocol's specificity when compared to alternative relaxation regimes. This study investigated the basic tenet underlying the a/t training rationale, that accurate a/t feedback representation facilitates the generation of these frequency components. Two groups of healthy volunteers were randomly assigned to either (a) real contingent a/t feedback training or (b) a noncontingent mock feedback control condition. The groups were compared on measures of theta/alpha (t/a) ratios within and across training sessions, as well as activational self-report scales after each session. The contingent a/t feedback group displayed significant within-session t/a ratio increments not evident in the mock control group, as well as higher overall t/a ratios in some but not all of the training sessions. No differences were found between the groups in terms of subjective activational phenomenology, in that both groups reported significantly lower levels of activation after training sessions. The data demonstrate that irrespective of considerations of clinical relevance, accurate a/t neurofeedback effectively facilitates production of higher within-session t/a ratios than do noncontingent feedback relaxation.

Keywords: alpha/theta neurofeedback; EEG signature; theta/alpha ratios; acivational phenomenology

Language: English

Document Type: Research article

Affiliations: 1: Department of Cognitive Neuroscience and Behaviour, Faculty of Medicine, Imperial College of Science, Technology and Medicine, London, United Kingdom; t.egner@ic.ac.uk 2: Department of Cognitive Neuroscience and Behaviour, Faculty of Medicine, Imperial College of Science, Technology and Medicine, London, United Kingdom

Publication date: 2002-12-01

Related content

Key

Free Content
Free content
New Content
New content
Open Access Content
Open access content
Subscribed Content
Subscribed content
Free Trial Content
Free trial content

Text size:

A | A | A | A
Share this item with others: These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages. print icon Print this page