IngentaConnect The Non-Analytical Basis of Clinical Reasoning

Authors: Norman G.R.¹; Brooks L.R.¹

Source: Advances in Health Sciences Education, Volume 2, Number 2, 1997 , pp. 173-184(12)

Publisher: Springer

Abstract:

This paper explores the assertion that much of clinical diagnostic thinking is based on the rapid and unconscious matching of the presenting problem to a similar, previously encountered, problem. This `non-analytic' form of concept formation has been described in the psychology literature for over a decade. From this theory, we deduce and test several hypotheses: 1) Diagnosis is based in part on similarity to a particular previous example. In studies in dermatology, specific similarity accounts for about 30% of diagnosis. 2) When experts err, these errors are as likely as novices to occur on typical presentations. For residents, general practitioners and dermatologists, about 40% of errors were on typical slides. 3) Features are re-interpreted in light of diagnostic hypotheses. In radiology, attaching a standard positive history to the film bag increased the number of features seen on both normal and abnormal films by about 50%. 4) Experts cannot predict errors of other experts. In dermatology, experts predicted only 11–60% of errors committed by their colleagues. We conclude that amassing prior instances is an important component of expertise, and education should recognize this element.

Language: English

Document Type: Regular paper

Affiliations: 1: McMaster University, Health Science Center, 1200 Main Street West, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada L8N 3Z5

The full text electronic article is available for purchase. You will be able to download the full text electronic article after payment.

$47.00 plus tax Refund Policy