Dominance in feeding territories relates to foraging success and offspring growth in brown skuas Catharacta antarctica lonnbergi

Authors: Hahn, Steffen1; Bauer, Silke2

Source: Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, Volume 62, Number 7, May 2008 , pp. 1149-1157(9)

Publisher: Springer

Key:
Free Content - Free Content
New Content - New Content
Subscribed Content - Subscribed Content
Free Trial Content - Free Trial Content

Abstract:

Territoriality should lead to strict dominance, as territory holders typically control access to resources and exclude others from their use. In feeding territories, dominance should be reflected in foraging success and ultimately in reproduction differences; however, these successive links have rarely been made explicit. Therefore, we investigated a population of brown skuas Catharacta antarctica lonnbergi, in which only part of the breeding population occupied feeding territories within penguin colonies. We identified the dominance hierarchy and determined the foraging success of the participants in fights for access to penguin carcasses within the territories. Furthermore, we monitored offspring growth from parents with and without feeding territories. Our results indicated a clear dominance hierarchy with territorial birds in their own territory dominating over territorial breeders from other territories, non-territorial breeders and non-breeding birds. However, territory owners could not completely exclude others from access to food. Foraging success was positively related to dominance scores: The dominant territory owners received 63% of a carcass, whereas non-territorial pairs could get less than 10%. The link between foraging success and offspring development was less clear: Although male chicks of non-territorial parents suffered from lower growth rates and, thus, delayed fledging, there were no such differences in female chicks. Territoriality in skuas did not imply a complete occupation of food, but guaranteed optimal growth conditions for offspring. Non-territorial individuals were forced to search for alternative resources, and the restricted access to the preferred food resulted in inferior conditions for offspring development, making this foraging strategy less rewarding.

Keywords: Territorial fights; Aggression; Territoriality; Dominance hierarchy; Growth trajectory; Seabird

Document Type: Research article

DOI: 10.1007/s00265-007-0543-7

Affiliations: 1: Institute of Ecology, Friedrich-Schiller University Jena, Dornburger Strasse 159, 07743, Jena, Germany, Email: s.hahn@nioo.knaw.nl 2: Centre for Limnology, Netherlands Institute of Ecology (NIOO-KNAW), P.O. Box 1299, 3600 BG, Maarssen, The Netherlands

The full text electronic article is available for purchase. You will be able to download the full text electronic article after payment.

$42.00 plus tax

 

OR

Back to top

Key:
Free Content - Free Content
New Content - New Content
Subscribed Content - Subscribed Content
Free Trial Content - Free Trial Content
Page Help Click here for Page Help
Shopping cart
Tools
Sign in






Need to register?
Sign up here
Text size: A | A | A | A