Research misconduct among clinical trial staff

Authors: Redman, Barbara; Templin, Thomas; Merz, Jon

Source: Science and Engineering Ethics, Volume 12, Number 3, September 2006 , pp. 481-489(9)

Publisher: Springer

Buy & download fulltext article:

Price: $47.00 plus tax (Refund Policy)

Abstract:

Between 1993 and 2002, 39 clinical trial staff were investigated for scientific misconduct by the Office of Research Integrity (ORI). Analysis of ORI case records reveals practices regarding workload, training and supervision that enable misconduct. Considering the potential effects on human subjects protection, quality and reliability of data, and the trustworthiness of the clinical research enterprise, regulations or guidance on use of clinical trial staff ought to be available. Current ORI regulations do not hold investigators or institutions responsible for supervision and training of clinical trial staff. Given the important issues at stake, the definition of research misconduct should encompass the intentional or negligent mismanagement of scientific projects. Individual institutions and professional associations not only can but should adopt stricter standards of conduct than those reflected in federal regulations.

Keywords: research misconduct

Document Type: Research article

DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11948-006-0046-3

Affiliations: 1: Email: ae9080@wayne.edu

Publication date: 2006-09-01