Percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy in patients with ventriculoperitoneal shunts

Authors: Taylor A.L.; Carroll T.A.; Jakubowski J.; O'Reilly G.

Source: British Journal of Surgery, Volume 88, Number 5, May 2001 , pp. 724-727(4)

Publisher: John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Buy & download fulltext article:

The full text article is not available for purchase.

The publisher only permits individual articles to be downloaded by subscribers.

Abstract:

Background:

Percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG) may be required in neurosurgical patients with a persistently depressed neurological status or severe lower cranial nerve palsies. Such patients may have a coexisting hydrocephalus requiring cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) diversion. Despite the risk of infection resulting from exposure to oropharyngeal flora by the pull-through PEG technique and the secondary pneumoperitoneum seen in one-third of patients, simultaneous peritoneal placement of CSF shunt catheters with PEG is the current practice. The aim of the study was to determine the frequency of CSF diversionary procedures in neurosurgical patients undergoing PEG insertion and the occurrence of infective complications in patients with simultaneous placement of a PEG and a ventriculoperitoneal (VP) shunt.

Methods:

This was a retrospective review of all neurosurgical patients undergoing PEG. The presence of hydrocephalus, mode of CSF diversion and the development of subsequent infection in those having coexistent distal peritoneal catheter placement and PEG were determined.

Results:

PEGs were placed in 42 neurosurgical patients (9·3 per cent of all PEGs inserted), of whom 21 had a coexisting hydrocephalus. Eight of 16 shunts with distal catheter placement in the peritoneal cavity developed infection requiring revision. Infections occurred with greater frequency in patients with a tracheostomy. There were no shunt infections requiring revision in a second group of 21 patients who had a coexisting shunt and tracheostomy without PEG.

Conclusion:

Simultaneous placement of a PEG and a VP shunt should be avoided in the acute phase of a patient's hospital admission.

Language: English

Document Type: Research article

Publication date: 2001-05-01

More about this publication?
Related content

Tools

Key

Free Content
Free content
New Content
New content
Open Access Content
Open access content
Subscribed Content
Subscribed content
Free Trial Content
Free trial content

Text size:

A | A | A | A
Share this item with others: These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages. print icon Print this page