A prospective randomized study of follow-up after radical surgery for colorectal cancer

Authors: KJELDSEN B.J.^{1, *}; KRONBORG O.¹; FENGER C.¹; JORGENSEN O.D.¹

Source: British Journal of Surgery, Volume 84, Number 5, May 1997 , pp. 666-669(4)

Publisher: John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Abstract:

Background The possible benefit for patients from follow-up examinations after curative surgery for colorectal cancer is unproven. The purpose of this study was to determine whether survival is improved by frequent follow-up examinations.Methods A total of 597 patients less than 76 years old treated with radical surgery for colorectal cancer were included in the study from 1983 to 1994. Patients were randomized to frequent follow-up (group 1) or virtually no follow-up (group 2) with examinations at 5 and 10 years.Results Group 1 comprised 290 patients, group 2 contained 307. Recurrence was equally frequent (26 per cent), but the time of diagnosis was 9 months earlier in group 1; also, more recurrences were asymptomatic in group 1 and more patients had new surgery with curative intent (P=0?02). However, no improvement in overall survival or in cancer-related survival resulted.Conclusion Patients subjected to intensive follow-up have recurrence diagnosed earlier, and have more operations for recurrence, but the survival results suggest that any major improvement by intensive follow-up is unlikely.

Language: English

Document Type: Research article

Affiliations: 1: Departments of Surgery A and Pathology, Odense University Hospital, 5000 Odense, Denmark *

Publication date: 1997-05-01

• As of January 2010, this journal will no longer be available on IngentaConnect, please visit Wiley InterScience to arrange continued access to this content
• Access this journal at Wiley InterScience
• ingentaconnect is not responsible for the content or availability of external websites

• In this: publication
• By this: publisher
• In this Subject: Surgery
• By this author: KJELDSEN B.J. ;  KRONBORG O. ;  FENGER C. ;  JORGENSEN O.D.

Website © Publishing Technology. Article copyright remains with the publisher, society or author(s) as specified within the article.

• Terms and conditions
• Privacy policy
• Information for advertisers