Authors: Lefebvre, Quentin; Vandergoten, Thomas; Derom, Eric; Marchandise, Emilie; Liistro, Giuseppe

Source: Respiratory Care, Volume 57, Number 8, August 2012 , pp. 1273-1277(5)

Publisher: The Journal Respiratory Care Company

Abstract:

BACKGROUND: Office spirometers are now widely used to detect obstructive lung diseases. To test the technical characteristics of these devices, simulation of different forced expiratory maneuvers is performed, using computer generated waveforms. However, the tests with human subjects are also useful to detect technical flaws. The procedure used by some authors to test the accuracy of office spirometers is to compare measurements made by 2 spirometers connected in series. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to evaluate the accuracy of this latter procedure. METHODS: Two sets of 2 spirometers connected in series were used: the PocketSpiro with the MicroLoop, and the PocketSpiro with the SpiroScout. Different standard American Thoracic Society curves were selected for both ambient temperature and pressure (ATP) and body temperature and pressure saturated (BTPS) conditions and generated with a waveform simulator. We compared lung function indices (FVC, peak expiratory flow, and FEV₁) recorded by the PocketSpiro when it was placed respectively upstream or downstream in the assembly. RESULTS: In ATP conditions, lung function indices were generally higher when the spirometer was placed downstream rather than upstream. The observed deviations reached up to 10%. In BTPS conditions, lung function indices were underestimated when the spirometer was placed downstream, as compared to the ATP procedure. The modification of the flow characteristics and the temperature drop are the 2 mechanisms that could explain our results. CONCLUSIONS: Connecting the spirometers in series gives variable results, depending on the position of the spirometer in the assembly. Individual tests are therefore essential, as results are not interchangeable.

Keywords: spirometry; instrumentation; quality control; COPD; respiratory function tests; technology assessment; benchmarking

Document Type: Research article

DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.4187/respcare.01464

Affiliations: 1: Institute of Mechanics, Materials and Civil Engineering, Université Catholique de Louvain, Louvain-la-Neuve, Belgium

Publication date: 2012-08-01

More about this publication?

• As of January 1, 2013, Respiratory Care content will no longer be hosted on ingentaconnect. Please contact the publisher at info@aarc.org for information on how to continue access to this title.
• Editorial Board
• Information for Authors
• Submit a Paper
• Subscribe to this Title
• Membership Information
• Information for Advertisers
• Podcasts
• Clinical Practice Guidelines
• Past OPEN FORUM Abstracts
• ingentaconnect is not responsible for the content or availability of external websites

Related content

• In this: publication
• By this: publisher
• By this author: Lefebvre, Quentin ;  Vandergoten, Thomas ;  Derom, Eric ;  Marchandise, Emilie ;  Liistro, Giuseppe

Website © Publishing Technology. Article copyright remains with the publisher, society or author(s) as specified within the article.

• Terms and conditions
• Privacy policy
• Information for advertisers