If you are experiencing problems downloading PDF or HTML fulltext, our helpdesk recommend clearing your browser cache and trying again. If you need help in clearing your cache, please click here . Still need help? Email help@ingentaconnect.com

A Survey of Noninvasive Ventilation Practices in a Respiratory ICU of North India

The full text article is not available for purchase.

The publisher only permits individual articles to be downloaded by subscribers.


BACKGROUND: There is paucity of data from India on the use of noninvasive ventilation (NIV) in acute respiratory failure (ARF). In this observational study, we report the indications and outcomes of patients requiring NIV in the respiratory ICU of a tertiary care hospital. METHODS: All patients with ARF requiring NIV were included in the study. NIV was delivered through critical care ventilators, using oronasal mask. The disease severity and new-onset organ dysfunction/failure were calculated using the Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation (APACHE II) and Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) scores, respectively. A multivariate logistic regression model was used to analyze the factors predicting NIV failure. RESULTS: There were 92 subjects (48 men, 44 women, mean ± SD age 48 ± 17.5 y) who received 101 NIV applications (42 and 59 applications for episodes of hypoxemic and hypercapnic ARF, respectively) during the study period. The most common causes of hypoxemic and hypercapnic respiratory failure were acute lung injury/ARDS (29%) and COPD (29%), respectively. There was significant improvement in heart rate and respiratory rate after 1, 2, and 4 hours, compared to the baseline, in both the groups. Of the NIV applications, 53.5% required endotracheal intubation, with the number being significantly higher in hypoxemic (67%), compared to hypercapnic (44%), ARF (P = .03). The PaO2 /FIO2 measured after 1 hour of NIV application had significant impact on outcome in patients with hypoxemic but not hypercapnic ARF. A PaO2 /FIO2 of ≤ 146 mm Hg at one hour had a better specificity (85.7% vs 71.4%), versus a PaO2 /FIO2 of ≤ 175 mm Hg in predicting NIV failure in patients with hypoxemic ARF. On multivariate logistic regression analysis, baseline APACHE II score, ΔSOFA score, hypoxemic respiratory failure, and change in PaO2 /FIO2 at 1 hour from baseline were associated with NIV failure. CONCLUSIONS: NIV was found to be a useful modality in management of patients with hypercapnic versus hypoxemic respiratory failure. The severity of illness at admission, new-onset organ dysfunction, hypoxemic ARF, and delay in improvement in PaO2 /FIO2 at 1 hour from baseline are independent predictors of NIV failure.

Keywords: ARDS; COPD; NIV; noninvasive ventilation; respiratory failure

Document Type: Research Article

DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.4187/respcare.01541

Affiliations: Department of Pulmonary Medicine, Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, India

Publication date: July 1, 2012

More about this publication?
Related content



Share Content

Access Key

Free Content
Free content
New Content
New content
Open Access Content
Open access content
Subscribed Content
Subscribed content
Free Trial Content
Free trial content
Cookie Policy
Cookie Policy
ingentaconnect website makes use of cookies so as to keep track of data that you have filled in. I am Happy with this Find out more