If you are experiencing problems downloading PDF or HTML fulltext, our helpdesk recommend clearing your browser cache and trying again. If you need help in clearing your cache, please click here . Still need help? Email help@ingentaconnect.com

Classifying Different Types of Double Triggering Based on Airway Pressure and Flow Deflection in Mechanically Ventilated Patients

The full text article is not available for purchase.

The publisher only permits individual articles to be downloaded by subscribers.


BACKGROUND: Double-triggering (DT) is a frequent type of patient-ventilator asynchrony and has potentially severe consequences, such as alveolar overdistention or the generation of intrinsic PEEP. However, the first breath of DT could be patient-triggered (DT-P), auto-triggered (DT-A), or ventilator-triggered (DT-V). OBJECTIVE: To differentiate DT-P, DT-A, and DT-V using airway pressure or flow changes during the trigger-delay phase in ventilated patients. METHODS: Fourteen mechanically ventilated patients with DT were included. All patients were on flow-triggered ventilation modes and received either continuous mandatory ventilation or pressure support ventilation. Breaths in which the first breath was associated with an esophageal pressure drop of > 1 cm H2O were categorized as DT-P. Breaths in which the first breath occurred at the ventilator set cycle were categorized as DT-V. Breaths in which the first breath occurred earlier than the ventilator set cycle without esophageal pressure drop were categorized as DT-A. The pressure drop and flow change at 0.13 s (PD0.13 and F0.13, respectively) in the trigger-delay phase were calculated from the nadir. RESULTS: There were 507 double-triggered breaths: 271 DT-V (53%), 50 DT-A (10%), and 186 DT-P (37%). The PD0.13 for DT-V, DT-A, and DT-P were 0.16 ± 0.12 cm H2O, 0.25 ± 0.17 cm H2O, and 1.34 ± 0.67 cm H2O, respectively. The F0.13 for DT-V, DT-A, and DT-P were 2.11 ± 2.31 L/min, 2.64 ± 2.07 L/min, and 16.51 ± 8.02 L/min, respectively. The best discriminatory criteria for differentiating DT-P from DT-V and DT-A, based on the Youden index (sensitivity + specificity ‐ 1) was PD0.13 ≥ 0.49 cm H2O, which had a Youden index of 95%. CONCLUSION: DT-P can be distinguished from DT-V and DT-A by using airway pressure deflections in the trigger-delay phase.

Keywords: double triggering; patient-ventilator asynchrony

Document Type: Research Article

DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.4187/respcare.00731

Affiliations: Chiali Hospital, Chiali Town, Tainan, Taiwan

Publication date: April 1, 2011

More about this publication?
Related content



Share Content

Access Key

Free Content
Free content
New Content
New content
Open Access Content
Open access content
Subscribed Content
Subscribed content
Free Trial Content
Free trial content
Cookie Policy
Cookie Policy
ingentaconnect website makes use of cookies so as to keep track of data that you have filled in. I am Happy with this Find out more