A Survey of the Use of Noninvasive Ventilation in Academic Emergency Departments in the United States

The full text article is not available for purchase.

The publisher only permits individual articles to be downloaded by subscribers.

Abstract:

OBJECTIVE: To determine the frequency of, and barriers to, use of noninvasive ventilation (NIV) for adult patients with acute asthma, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), and congestive heart failure (CHF) in academic emergency departments (EDs). METHODS: A survey instrument was developed by the authors, pilot tested, and distributed to one physician (MD) and one respiratory therapist (RT) at the 132 hospitals with emergency medicine residencies. RESULTS: The response rate was 90. Ninety-nine percent of RTs and 64% of MDs are very familiar with NIV (P < .001). The reported time needed to initiate NIV was < 10 min for 41% of sites (< 20 min for 89%). Compared to the time requirement in other clinical areas, 60% of RTs reported that NIV “takes no additional time” in the ED. An RT is always present in 38% the EDs, and equipment for NIV is readily available in 76% of the EDs. The majority reported that NIV use is about right for acute COPD, CHF, and asthma. NIV is used infrequently for asthma (89% reported use in < 20% of these patients), while 66% reported use in > 20% of COPD patients and 67% reported use in > 20% of CHF patients (P < .001, as compared to asthma). The perceived utility of NIV was significantly different between the 3 diagnoses (P < .001); there was more uncertainty about the utility of NIV for asthma. Bilevel ventilators and oronasal masks are most commonly used for NIV. Nearly all of the centers administer bronchodilators in-line with NIV. CONCLUSIONS: Consistent with available evidence, NIV use is more common in the ED for acute COPD and CHF than for acute asthma. Barriers to greater use of NIV in the ED include physician familiarity, availability of RT and equipment in the ED, and time required for NIV. For acute asthma, uncertainty about therapeutic benefits remains a challenge.

Keywords: asthma; chronic obstructive pulmonary disease; congestive heart failure; emergency medicine; noninvasive ventilation; respiratory care; survey

Document Type: Research Article

Publication date: October 1, 2009

More about this publication?
Related content

Tools

Favourites

Share Content

Access Key

Free Content
Free content
New Content
New content
Open Access Content
Open access content
Subscribed Content
Subscribed content
Free Trial Content
Free trial content
Cookie Policy
X
Cookie Policy
ingentaconnect website makes use of cookies so as to keep track of data that you have filled in. I am Happy with this Find out more