Evaluation of the User Interface Simplicity in the Modern Generation of Mechanical Ventilators

The full text article is not available for purchase.

The publisher only permits individual articles to be downloaded by subscribers.

Abstract:

OBJECTIVE: We designed this study to evaluate the simplicity of the user interface in modern-generation mechanical ventilators. We hypothesized that different designs in the user interface could result in different rates of operational failures. SETTING: A laboratory in a tertiary teaching hospital. DESIGN: Crossover design. SUBJECTS: Twenty-one medical resident physicians who did not possess operating experience with any of the selected ventilators. METHODS: Four modern mechanical ventilators were selected: Dräger Evita XL, Maquet Servo-i, Newport e500, and Puritan Bennett 840. Each subject was requested to perform 8 tasks on each ventilator. Two objective variables (the number of successfully completed tasks without operational failures and the operational time) and the overall subjective rating of the ease of use, measured with a 100-mm visual analog scale were recorded. RESULTS: The total percentage of operational failures made for all subjects, for all tasks, was 23%. There were significant differences in the rates of operational failures and operational time among the 4 ventilators. Subjects made more operational failures in setting up the ventilators and in making ventilator-setting changes than in reacting to alarms. The subjective feeling of the ease of use was also significantly different among the ventilators. CONCLUSION: The design of the user interface is relevant to the occurrence of operational failures. Our data indicate that ventilator designers could optimize the user-interface design to reduce the operational failures; therefore, basic user interface should be standardized among the clinically used mechanical ventilators.

Keywords: ERGONOMICS; MECHANICAL VENTILATOR; OPERATIONAL FAILURE; USABILITY; USER INTERFACE; VENTILATOR DESIGN

Document Type: Research Article

Affiliations: 1: Kameda Medical Center, Chiba, Japan 2: The University of Tokyo School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan 3: Jichi Medical School, Tochigi-ken, Japan

Publication date: March 1, 2008

More about this publication?
Related content

Tools

Favourites

Share Content

Access Key

Free Content
Free content
New Content
New content
Open Access Content
Open access content
Subscribed Content
Subscribed content
Free Trial Content
Free trial content
Cookie Policy
X
Cookie Policy
ingentaconnect website makes use of cookies so as to keep track of data that you have filled in. I am Happy with this Find out more