An Assessment of the Appropriateness of Respiratory Care Delivered at a 450-Bed Acute Care Veterans Affairs Hospital
INTRODUCTION: Respiratory care is expensive and time-intensive, inappropriate care wastes resources, and failure to provide necessary and appropriate respiratory care may adversely affect patient outcomes. OBJECTIVE: To determine the appropriateness of basic respiratory care delivered
at a 450-bed Veterans Affairs hospital during a 3-month interval. METHODS: We determined (1) the percentage of delivered respiratory care that was not indicated (based on standardized clinical practice guidelines), (2) the percentage of respiratory care that was indicated but not ordered (based
on standardized clinical practice guidelines), and (3) the labor cost and potential savings of protocol-based respiratory care at our hospital. We selected 5 assessment days, occurring at 2-week intervals. All patients who received basic respiratory care underwent a complete respiratory care
assessment, including medical records review, patient interview, physical assessment, and measurement of blood oxygen saturation (via pulse oximetry) and inspiratory capacity. Intensive care patients were excluded from the study. The assessment instrument provided a standardized format based
on American Association for Respiratory Care clinical practice guidelines. RESULTS: We assessed 75 patients. A mean of 24.8% of the delivered respiratory therapies reviewed were not indicated. The percentages of ordered but not indicated therapies were: oxygen 17.7%; all categories of aerosolized
medications (bronchodilators, mucolytics, anti-inflammatory agents) 32.4%; chest physiotherapy 37.5%; lung expansion therapy 7.7%. A mean of 11.8% of the patients assessed were not receiving respiratory care that was indicated. The percentages of indicated but not ordered therapies were: oxygen
5.3%; bronchodilator 5.3%; lung expansion therapy 36%. CONCLUSION: A mean of 24.8% of the basic respiratory care procedures delivered were not indicated and 11.8% of patients were not receiving care that was indicated. Inappropriate utilization of respiratory care services may increase costs
and adversely affect morbidity, mortality, and duration of stay. We believe that implementation of respiratory care assessment protocols based on nationally accepted clinical practice guidelines can reduce unnecessary care, optimize care delivered, and may reduce costs and improve outcomes.
CLINICAL PRACTICE GUIDELINES;
Document Type: Research Article
College of Health Related Professions, The University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, #619, 4301 W Markham, Little Rock, AR 72205-7199
Department of Respiratory Care, The University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio, San Antonio, Texas
Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Department of Medicine, and the Department of Respiratory Care, The University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio, San Antonio, Texas
Publication date: August 1, 2004
More about this publication?