A Comparison of the OxyArm Oxygen Delivery Device and Standard Nasal Cannulae in Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease Patients
Source: Respiratory Care, Volume 48, Number 2, February 2003 , pp. 120-123(4)
Publisher: The Journal Respiratory Care Company
Abstract:OBJECTIVE: Compare the performance of the OxyArm to that of nasal cannulae in the delivery of supplemental oxygen to patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. METHODS: We tested various oxygen flows with 10 chronic obstructive pulmonary disease patients who were receiving prescribed supplemental oxygen. Blood oxygen saturation (measured via pulse oximetry [SpO2]), was measured with each device, and mean data were compared with paired, 2-sample t tests. RESULTS: Mean SpO2 was equivalent with OxyArm and nasal cannulae for 7 of the 10 subjects, over a range of oxygen flows (2–5 L/min). Mean SpO2 was higher with the OxyArm with 2 subjects and lower with 1 subject (p < 0.01). CONCLUSION: The OxyArm maintained stable SpO2 over the range of oxygen flows studied and at levels equivalent to those maintained by nasal cannulae in 9 of the 10 subjects. The OxyArm does not contact the face and may be ideal for patients on long-term home oxygen therapy.
Document Type: Research Article
Publication date: 2003-02-01
- As of January 1, 2013, Respiratory Care content will no longer be hosted on ingentaconnect. Please contact the publisher at firstname.lastname@example.org for information on how to continue access to this title.
- Editorial Board
- Information for Authors
- Submit a Paper
- Subscribe to this Title
- Membership Information
- Information for Advertisers
- Clinical Practice Guidelines
- Past OPEN FORUM Abstracts
- ingentaconnect is not responsible for the content or availability of external websites