If you are experiencing problems downloading PDF or HTML fulltext, our helpdesk recommend clearing your browser cache and trying again. If you need help in clearing your cache, please click here . Still need help? Email email@example.com
Iran’s nuclear weapons program remains a growing and potentially existential threat to Israel. Understood jurisprudentially, the threat is literally genocidal. This article establishes a strategic dialectic from which a suitable Israeli strategic doctrine could be derived and
operationalized. Key issues discussed include a Palestinian state (in context of the socalled “Road Map”); enemy rationality; enhanced Israeli nuclear deterrence; counter-city versus counter-force nuclear targeting options; improved ballistic missile defense; the “Samson
Option;” escalation dominance; and possible Israeli preemptions. The article concludes that Israel’s leaders should promptly recall that their country confronts a nuclearizing Iran within a still-anarchic, “Westphalian” system of international relations and international
law. National survival in such an inherently self-help system will now require adequate and expanding military emphases on all forms of self-defense, including anticipatory self-defense.
Political Crossroads is a bi-annual, international, refereed journal which, since 1990, publishes critical and empirical scholarship in political science and international relations. Its areas of focus include global security, terrorism, national identity, migration and citizenship, and the politics of resources and trade.