Reconciling float-based and tracer-based estimates of lateral diffusivities

The full text article is not available for purchase.

The publisher only permits individual articles to be downloaded by subscribers.

Abstract:

Lateral diffusivities are computed from synthetic particles and tracers advected by a velocity field derived from sea-surface height measurements from the South Pacific, in a region west of Drake Passage. Three different estimates are compared: (1) the tracer-based “effective diffusivity” of Nakamura (1996), (2) the growth of the second moment of a cloud of tracer and (3) the single- and two-particle Lagrangian diffusivities. The effective diffusivity measures the cross-stream component of eddy mixing, so this article focuses on the meridional diffusivities for the others, as the mean flow (the ACC) is zonally oriented in the region.

After an initial transient of a few weeks, the effective diffusivity agrees well with the meridional diffusivity estimated both from the tracer cloud and from the particles. This proves that particle- and tracer-based estimates of eddy diffusivities are equivalent, despite recent claims to the contrary. Convergence among the three estimates requires that the Lagrangian diffusivities be estimated using their asymptotic values, not their maximum values. The former are generally much lower than the latter in the presence of a mean flow.

Sampling the long-time asymptotic behavior of Lagrangian diffusivities requires very large numbers of floats in field campaigns. For example, it is shown that hundreds of floats would be necessary to estimate the vertical and horizontal variations in eddy diffusivity in a sector of the Pacific Southern Ocean.

Document Type: Research Article

DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1357/002224012805262743

Publication date: July 1, 2012

More about this publication?
  • The Journal of Marine Research publishes peer-reviewed research articles covering a broad array of topics in physical, biological and chemical oceanography. Articles that deal with processes, as well as those that report significant observations, are welcome. In the area of biology, studies involving coupling between ecological and physical processes are preferred over those that report systematics. Authors benefit from thorough reviews of their manuscripts, where an attempt is made to maximize clarity. The time between submission and publication is kept to a minimum; there is no page charge.
  • Editorial Board
  • Information for Authors
  • Subscribe to this Title
  • ingentaconnect is not responsible for the content or availability of external websites
Related content

Share Content

Access Key

Free Content
Free content
New Content
New content
Open Access Content
Open access content
Subscribed Content
Subscribed content
Free Trial Content
Free trial content
Cookie Policy
X
Cookie Policy
ingentaconnect website makes use of cookies so as to keep track of data that you have filled in. I am Happy with this Find out more