Skip to main content

Free Content The legacy of Gordon Arthur Riley (1911–1985) and the development of mathematical models in biological oceanography

Download Article:
(PDF 1,432.2 kb)
Gordon Arthur Riley (1911–1985) is remembered for his pioneering work in the development of marine ecosystem models during the mid-20th century. Using models that were necessarily simple because of the limited understanding of plankton physiology at the time, as well as the fact that calculations had to be done by hand, Riley studied the processes that control plankton stocks, production, and nutrient cycling, notably at Georges Bank. His great achievement lay not so much in the simulation of plankton dynamics per se, but rather in bringing to the fore the concept of using modeling as a means of explaining and interpreting the dynamics of marine ecosystems.

In this article, we examine Riley's approach and philosophy to ecosystem modeling, which we discuss in context of modern day approaches. In particular, we focus on his landmark paper describing a model study of the dynamics of phytoplankton production on Georges Bank (Riley, 1946: J. Mar. Res., 6, 54-73). After reconstructing the model, we show how Riley created new mathematical characterizations of the environmental dependencies of each process in the phytoplankton equation, and how these relate to modern day formulations. We then reproduce Riley's results and conduct further analyses and sensitivity tests which serve to illustrate Riley's conviction that mathematical models can provide clear, rational explanations for the observed temporal changes in ecosystems.

Riley's methods and outlook are discussed in context of the ongoing debate about the merits of complex versus simple marine ecosystem models. Based on our analyses of Riley's model, as well as his own critiques, we argue that although recent decades have seen a proliferation of complex ecosystem models that are intended to reflect our expanded understanding, the doctrines proposed by Riley are no less relevant today. In particular, Riley noted that while increasing model complexity is generally desirable, it can only be done within the confines afforded by observational data and knowledge of the physiology and ecology of key species and their interactions.

87 References.

No Supplementary Data.
No Article Media
No Metrics

Document Type: Research Article

Publication date: 01 January 2012

More about this publication?
  • The Journal of Marine Research publishes peer-reviewed research articles covering a broad array of topics in physical, biological and chemical oceanography. Articles that deal with processes, as well as those that report significant observations, are welcome. In the area of biology, studies involving coupling between ecological and physical processes are preferred over those that report systematics. Authors benefit from thorough reviews of their manuscripts, where an attempt is made to maximize clarity. The time between submission and publication is kept to a minimum; there is no page charge.
  • Editorial Board
  • Information for Authors
  • Subscribe to this Title
  • Ingenta Connect is not responsible for the content or availability of external websites
  • Access Key
  • Free content
  • Partial Free content
  • New content
  • Open access content
  • Partial Open access content
  • Subscribed content
  • Partial Subscribed content
  • Free trial content
Cookie Policy
Cookie Policy
Ingenta Connect website makes use of cookies so as to keep track of data that you have filled in. I am Happy with this Find out more