Sensitivity of plankton biomass and productivity to variations in physical forcing and biological parameters in Chesapeake Bay

The full text article is not available for purchase.

The publisher only permits individual articles to be downloaded by subscribers.

Abstract:

A coupled three-dimensional hydrodynamic-biogeochemical model is used to simulate plankton dynamics in Chesapeake Bay and examine its sensitivity to variations in biological parameters and physical forcing. The coupled biophysical model captures observed seasonal cycle and regional distributions of plankton in Chesapeake Bay and predicts the "phase lag" between the spring chlorophyll maximum and the summer primary productivity maximum. This lag traces to the delivery of dissolved inorganic nutrients in the winter-spring freshet from the Susquehanna River that fuels the spring bloom, whereas regenerated nutrients support high primary productivity in summer. The model shows that episodic wind events commonly associated with frontal passages in summer inject nutrients into the euphotic layer, leading to short periods of elevated primary productivity. Quantitative comparisons between the predicted and observed annual time series of euphotic-layer chlorophyll and primary productivity show that the model possesses reasonable skill. Sensitivity analyses of model simulations for different biological parameter values and alternative formulations of biogeochemical processes suggest that model predictions are robust. To understand the impacts of climate variability and change on Chesapeake Bay, we examine how the plankton system responds to variations in river runoff, wind forcing, temperature and light level. Annual mean chlorophyll (AMC) and annual integrated production (AIP) increase by about 70% for a doubling of river runoff, but only reduce by 30% and 13% for 50% reduction of river runoff, suggesting a nonlinear response of plankton system to changes in river runoff and nutrient loading. Doubling of wind stress results in a small increase in AMC but 28% increase in AIP. For 2°C warming AMC increases from 25.4 to 30 mg m−2 and AIP increases from 180 to 246 g C m−2 yr−1.

Document Type: Research Article

DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1357/002224009791218878

Publication date: September 1, 2009

More about this publication?
  • The Journal of Marine Research publishes peer-reviewed research articles covering a broad array of topics in physical, biological and chemical oceanography. Articles that deal with processes, as well as those that report significant observations, are welcome. In the area of biology, studies involving coupling between ecological and physical processes are preferred over those that report systematics. Authors benefit from thorough reviews of their manuscripts, where an attempt is made to maximize clarity. The time between submission and publication is kept to a minimum; there is no page charge.
  • Editorial Board
  • Information for Authors
  • Subscribe to this Title
  • ingentaconnect is not responsible for the content or availability of external websites
Related content

Share Content

Access Key

Free Content
Free content
New Content
New content
Open Access Content
Open access content
Subscribed Content
Subscribed content
Free Trial Content
Free trial content
Cookie Policy
X
Cookie Policy
ingentaconnect website makes use of cookies so as to keep track of data that you have filled in. I am Happy with this Find out more