Relative dispersion in the Nordic Seas

The full text article is not available for purchase.

The publisher only permits individual articles to be downloaded by subscribers.

Abstract:

We examine the relative dispersion of surface drifters deployed in the POLEWARD experiment in the Nordic Seas during 2007–2008. The drifters were launched in pairs and triplets, yielding 67 pairs with an initial separation of 2 km or less. There were 26 additional pairs from drifters which subsequently came near one another. As these produced statistically identical dispersion to the original pairs, we used them as well, yielding 93 pairs.

The relative dispersion exhibits three phases. The first occurs during the first two days, at spatial scales less than 10 km. The dispersion increases approximately exponentially during this period, with an e-folding time of roughly half a day. During the second phase, from 2 to roughly 10 days and scales of 10 to roughly 100 km, the dispersion increases as a power law, with r2 α t3. At the largest spatial and temporal scales, the dispersion increases linearly in time and the pair velocities are uncorrelated, consistent with diffusive spreading.

We use a stochastic model with a representative mean flow to test the effect of the mean shear on dispersion. The model produces dispersion comparable to the observed during the second and third phases but fails to capture other statistics, such as the PDFs of the displacements. These statistics are instead suggestive of an inverse energy cascade, from the deformation scale up to 100 km.

Document Type: Research Article

DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1357/002224009790741102

Publication date: July 1, 2009

More about this publication?
  • The Journal of Marine Research publishes peer-reviewed research articles covering a broad array of topics in physical, biological and chemical oceanography. Articles that deal with processes, as well as those that report significant observations, are welcome. In the area of biology, studies involving coupling between ecological and physical processes are preferred over those that report systematics. Authors benefit from thorough reviews of their manuscripts, where an attempt is made to maximize clarity. The time between submission and publication is kept to a minimum; there is no page charge.
  • Editorial Board
  • Information for Authors
  • Subscribe to this Title
  • ingentaconnect is not responsible for the content or availability of external websites
Related content

Share Content

Access Key

Free Content
Free content
New Content
New content
Open Access Content
Open access content
Subscribed Content
Subscribed content
Free Trial Content
Free trial content
Cookie Policy
X
Cookie Policy
ingentaconnect website makes use of cookies so as to keep track of data that you have filled in. I am Happy with this Find out more