Mismatch between community respiration and the contribution of heterotrophic bacteria in the NE Atlantic open ocean: What causes high respiration in oligotrophic waters?
Heterotrophic bacteria have long been considered as the major respirers of the open ocean. During a survey in the eastern N Atlantic Subtropical Gyre we measured 3H-leucine heterotrophic bacterial production (BP), 14C particulate primary production (PPP) and the O2 community metabolism rates: gross primary production (GPP), net community production (NCP) and community respiration (CR). We estimated heterotrophic bacterial respiration (BR) from BP and literature models of bacterial growth efficiency [BGE = BP/(BP + BR)]. BP was an order of magnitude lower than PPP (integrated means of 17 ± 2 and 207 ± 29 mg C m−2 d−1, respectively). Although volumetric PPP and GPP were significantly correlated (r = 0.51; p = 0.009; n = 25), CR (1120 ± 122 mg C m−2 d−1) bore no significant relationship with either primary or heterotrophic bacterial production and exceeded GPP (578 ± 117 mg C m−2 d−1) at 5 out of 6 sampling stations. Integrated values of CR were only significantly correlated, but negatively, with chlorophyll a values (r = −0.95; p <0.001; n = 6). Integrated BR tended to decrease with increasing CR and, with a mean estimated BGE of 6%, it accounted on average for a much lower fraction of CR (33 ± 7%) than currently assumed. By estimating the contributions of other trophic groups a large amount (48 ± 10%) of the measured CR remained unaccounted for. This gap in respiration estimates casts some doubt on the magnitude of the net heterotrophic balance frequently observed in oligotrophic waters from changes of O2 over 24 h dark in vitro incubations.
No Supplementary Data.
Document Type: Research Article
Publication date: 2007-07-01
More about this publication?
- The Journal of Marine Research publishes peer-reviewed research articles covering a broad array of topics in physical, biological and chemical oceanography. Articles that deal with processes, as well as those that report significant observations, are welcome. In the area of biology, studies involving coupling between ecological and physical processes are preferred over those that report systematics. Authors benefit from thorough reviews of their manuscripts, where an attempt is made to maximize clarity. The time between submission and publication is kept to a minimum; there is no page charge.
- Editorial Board
- Information for Authors
- Subscribe to this Title
- Ingenta Connect is not responsible for the content or availability of external websites