Skip to main content

Patient Perceptions of Missed Nursing Care

Buy Article:

$20.00 plus tax (Refund Policy)


Background: A series of studies involving nursing staff perception have shown that a significant amount of standard nursing care is being “missed”—that is, aspects of required patient care are omitted or significantly delayed. A study was conducted to (1) determine the elements of nursing care that patients are able to report on and (2) to gain insight into the extent and type of missed nursing care experienced by a group of patients.

Methods: In-depth, semistructured, face-to-face interviews, guided by open-ended and interactive questions, were conducted with 38 inpatients on seven different patient care units in an acute care hospital.

Findings: For Question 1, elements were categorized as fully reportable (for example, mouth care, bathing, and pain medication), partially reportable (hand washing, vital signs, and patient education), or not reportable (nursing assessment, skin assessment, intravenous site care). For Question 2, patients identified mouth care, ambulation, discharge planning, patient education, listening to them, and being kept informed as frequently missing. Patients sometimes missed response to call lights and alarms, meal assistance, pain medication and follow-up, other medication administration, and repositioning. Nursing care identified as rarely missed were bathing, vital signs, and hand washing.

Conclusions: There is a large area of care for which patients can give an account if they are cognizant of their surroundings and mentally able to do so. For certain aspects of care, patients' perceptions of missed care were similar to those of nursing staff. There is a need to link specific aspects of nursing care to patient outcomes to assist in determining how essential specific elements of nursing care are and the cost-benefit balance of completing them or not.

Document Type: Research Article

Publication date: 2012-04-01

More about this publication?
  • Published monthly, The Joint Commission Journal on Quality and Patient Safety is a peer-reviewed publication dedicated to providing health professionals with the information they need to promote the quality and safety of health care. The Joint Commission Journal on Quality and Patient Safety invites original manuscripts on the development, adaptation, and/or implementation of innovative thinking, strategies, and practices in improving quality and safety in health care. Case studies, program or project reports, reports of new methodologies or new applications of methodologies, research studies on the effectiveness of improvement interventions, and commentaries on issues and practices are all considered.

    David W. Baker, MD, MPH, FACP, executive vice president for the Division of Healthcare Quality Evaluation at The Joint Commission, is the inaugural editor-in-chief of The Joint Commission Journal on Quality and Patient Safety.

    Also known as Joint Commission Journal on Quality Improvement and Joint Commission Journal on Quality and Safety
  • Editorial Board
  • Information for Authors
  • Subscribe to this Title
  • Information for Advertisers
  • Reprints and Permissions
  • Index
  • Ingenta Connect is not responsible for the content or availability of external websites
  • Access Key
  • Free ContentFree content
  • Partial Free ContentPartial Free content
  • New ContentNew content
  • Open Access ContentOpen access content
  • Partial Open Access ContentPartial Open access content
  • Subscribed ContentSubscribed content
  • Partial Subscribed ContentPartial Subscribed content
  • Free Trial ContentFree trial content
Cookie Policy
Cookie Policy
Ingenta Connect website makes use of cookies so as to keep track of data that you have filled in. I am Happy with this Find out more