Background: Few studies have examined the safety risks of the annual outpatient clinic handoff that occurs when residents either advance to a higher level of training or graduate (“year-end transfer”). A multifaceted intervention was designed and implemented to identify
and improve followup of high-risk patients during academic year-end outpatient transfers in a psychiatry resident continuity clinic. Methods: Departing residents identified “acute” patients, who were scheduled on a priority basis for longer appointments during the first
month after the transfer. In addition, standardized written and face-to-face sign-outs occurred, incoming clinicians contacted every patient in the first week, and specialized didactics were provided. Results: For the three intervention years combined, the odds ratio of hospitalization
for acute patients compared to nonacute patients was 9.2 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 2.43, 34.7; p = .001). Compared to Year 1, the proportion of acute patients seen within 31 days in Years 2 and 3 increased by 32.2% (from 64.3% to 85.0%, p < .0001). The median time-to-first
visit for acute patients decreased by 42% (from 24 days in Year 1 to 14 days in Year 3, p = .001). Finally, resident perception of the quality of the handoff improved in all areas compared to baseline, including resident-to-resident communication (2.8 to 3.0, p = .03), accuracy
of caseload lists (2.8 to 4.1, p = .003), identification of highrisk patients (2.1 to 3.7, p < .0001), and usefulness of supervision during the transition (2.7 to 4.3, p < .0001). Conclusions: Categorical designation by the outgoing clinicians effectively identified
patients at higher risk for hospitalization during the transition. Relatively low-cost interventions may significantly improve patient safety and resident training in not only psychiatry, but also other disciplines and specialties.
Document Type: Research Article
Publication date: July 1, 2011
More about this publication?
Published monthly, The Joint Commission Journal on Quality and Patient Safety is a peer-reviewed publication dedicated to providing health professionals with the information they need to promote the quality and safety of health care. The Joint Commission Journal on Quality and Patient Safety invites original manuscripts on the development, adaptation, and/or implementation of innovative thinking, strategies, and practices in improving quality and safety in health care. Case studies, program or project reports, reports of new methodologies or new applications of methodologies, research studies on the effectiveness of improvement interventions, and commentaries on issues and practices are all considered.
Also known as Joint Commission Journal on Quality Improvement and Joint Commission Journal on Quality and Safety