Using Real-Time Demand Capacity Management to Improve Hospitalwide Patient Flow
Abstract:Background: The Joint Commission's accreditation standard on managing patient flow, effective January 2005, served as a call to action for hospitals, yet many hospitals still lack the processes and structures to admit or transfer patients to an inpatient bed on a timely basis. In 2007 the University of Pittsburgh Medical Center (UPMC) at Shadyside, a 526-bed tertiary care hospital, began testing and implementing real-time demand capacity management (RTDC) at an initial pilot site. The hospital had identified improved patient flow as a strategic goal in 2002, but a series of patient flow projects failed to result in improvement.
Implementing RTDC: Standard processes for the four RTDC steps—Predicting Capacity, Predicting Demand, Developing a Plan, and Evaluating a Plan—and standard structures for unit bed huddles and the hospital bed meetings were developed. The neurosurgery (NS) service line's ICU and stepdown unit were designated as the first pilot sites, but work was quickly spread to other units.
Results: Improvements were achieved and have been sustained through early 2011 for all measures, including (1) the unit-based reliability of discharge predictions; (2) overnight holds in the postanesthesia care unit, a problem eliminated two months after RTDC work began; (3) the percentage of patients who left without being seen (LWBS), routinely < 0.5% by May 2008; (5) the emergency department median length of stay for admitted patients, routinely < 4 hours after March 2008; and (6) aggregate length of stay (ALOS), generally maintained at < 5.75 days.
Conclusions: RTDC represents a promising approach to improving hospitalwide patient flow. Its four steps, integrated into current bed management processes, are not an add-on to the work needing to be accomplished everyday.
Document Type: Research Article
Publication date: May 1, 2011
More about this publication?
- Published monthly, The Joint Commission Journal on Quality and Patient Safety is a peer-reviewed publication dedicated to providing health professionals with the information they need to promote the quality and safety of health care. The Joint Commission Journal on Quality and Patient Safety invites original manuscripts on the development, adaptation, and/or implementation of innovative thinking, strategies, and practices in improving quality and safety in health care. Case studies, program or project reports, reports of new methodologies or new applications of methodologies, research studies on the effectiveness of improvement interventions, and commentaries on issues and practices are all considered.
David W. Baker, MD, MPH, FACP, executive vice president for the Division of Healthcare Quality Evaluation at The Joint Commission, is the inaugural editor-in-chief of The Joint Commission Journal on Quality and Patient Safety.
Also known as Joint Commission Journal on Quality Improvement and Joint Commission Journal on Quality and Safety
- Editorial Board
- Information for Authors
- Subscribe to this Title
- Information for Advertisers
- Reprints and Permissions
- Ingenta Connect is not responsible for the content or availability of external websites