Using a Data-Matrix–Coded Sponge Counting System Across a Surgical Practice: Impact After 18 Months
Authors: Cima, Robert R.; Kollengode, Anantha; Clark, James; Pool, Sarah; Weisbrod, Cheryl; Amstutz, Gwendolyn J.; Deschamps, Claude
Source: Joint Commission Journal on Quality and Patient Safety, Volume 37, Number 2, February 2011 , pp. 51
Publisher: Joint Commission Resources
Abstract:Background: Retained surgical items (RSIs), most commonly sponges, are infrequent. Yet despite sponge-counting standards, failure to maintain an accurate count is a common error. To improve counting performance, technology solutions have been developed. A data-matrix–coded sponge (DMS) system was evaluated and implemented in a highvolume academic surgical practice at Mayo Clinic Rochester (MCR). The primary end point was prevention of sponge RSIs after 18 months.
Methods: Two trials were conducted before implementation. A randomized-controlled trial assessed the system's function, efficiency, and ergonomics. The second, larger trial was conducted to validate the prior findings and test product improvements. After the trials, the system was implemented in all 128 operating/procedure rooms across the MCR campus on February 2, 2009. The institutionwide implementation was intended to avoid the possibility of having standard unmarked sponges and DMSs in the operating room suite concurrently.
Results: Before implementation, a retained sponge occurred on average every 64 days. Between February 2009 and July 2010, 87,404 procedures were performed, and 1,862,373 DMSs were used without an RSI (p < .001). After four cases, the average time to count a DMS decreased from 11 to 4 seconds. Total sponge counting time/operation in creased without any increase in overall operative time.
Conclusions: After 18 months, a DMS system eliminated sponge RSIs from a high-volume surgical practice. The DMS system caused no work-flow disruption or increases in case duration. Staff satisfaction was acceptable, with a high degree of trust in the system. The DMS system is a reliable and cost-effective technology that improves patient safety.
Document Type: Research Article
Publication date: February 1, 2011
- Published monthly, The Joint Commission Journal on Quality and Patient Safety is a peer-reviewed publication dedicated to providing health professionals with the information they need to promote the quality and safety of health care. The Joint Commission Journal on Quality and Patient Safety invites original manuscripts on the development, adaptation, and/or implementation of innovative thinking, strategies, and practices in improving quality and safety in health care. Case studies, program or project reports, reports of new methodologies or new applications of methodologies, research studies on the effectiveness of improvement interventions, and commentaries on issues and practices are all considered.
Also known as Joint Commission Journal on Quality Improvement and Joint Commission Journal on Quality and Safety
- Editorial Board
- Information for Authors
- Subscribe to this Title
- Information for Advertisers
- Reprints and Permissions
- ingentaconnect is not responsible for the content or availability of external websites