Authors: Alemi, Farrokh; Hurd, Patrick

Source: Joint Commission Journal on Quality and Patient Safety, Volume 35, Number 3, March 2009 , pp. 156-161(6)

Publisher: Joint Commission Resources

Abstract:

Background: Patient satisfaction surveys require considerable time and resources. Instead of only systematically seeking patient's input through standardized satisfaction surveys, it is proposed that insights into the performance of the organization should also be based on patient complaints. Complaint data are available at a fraction of the cost of conducting satisfaction surveys, and even though complaints may be rare, new analytical tools (for example, time-between control charts) enable the analysis of these data in ways that are helpful to improvement teams.

Case Study: Medical/Surgical Unit: The choice of whether the analysis should be done per day, per visit, or per discharge depends on the availability of data and the frequency of complaints. A case study shows that an analysis of the last 100 complaints (collected in a 50-day period) was sufficient to detect statistically significant change in the process of care. In the medica/surgical unit, although a complaint occasionally occurred, a series of complaints for the 22nd through the 24th day was unusual. These days of back-to-back complaints marked a departure from the general pattern of no complaints, for which improvement teams could determine the special cause.

Discussion: Whereas complaint data represent only the very dissatisfied patients, satisfaction surveys report the average of satisfied and dissatisfied patients. As a consequence, complaint data allow health care managers to hear the voice of their customers without the distortions caused by including other, more satisfied patients. The cost advantage of time to complaint is obvious. The most expensive component of conducting satisfaction surveys is the data collection. In contrast, most hospitals and many other organizations maintain a system for collecting patient complaints for legal and risk management reasons. Much more can be revealed about a unit's operations when both the complaint and the satisfaction rates

Document Type: Research article

Publication date: 2009-03-01

More about this publication?

• Published monthly, The Joint Commission Journal on Quality and Patient Safety is a peer-reviewed publication dedicated to providing health professionals with the information they need to promote the quality and safety of health care. The Joint Commission Journal on Quality and Patient Safety invites original manuscripts on the development, adaptation, and/or implementation of innovative thinking, strategies, and practices in improving quality and safety in health care. Case studies, program or project reports, reports of new methodologies or new applications of methodologies, research studies on the effectiveness of improvement interventions, and commentaries on issues and practices are all considered.
  
  Also known as Joint Commission Journal on Quality Improvement and Joint Commission Journal on Quality and Safety
• Editorial Board
• Information for Authors
• Subscribe to this Title
• Information for Advertisers
• Reprints and Permissions
• Joint Commission Journal on Quality and Patient Safety - Author Index
• ingentaconnect is not responsible for the content or availability of external websites

Related content

• In this: publication
• By this: publisher
• In this Subject: Medicine ,  Public Health
• By this author: Alemi, Farrokh ;  Hurd, Patrick

Website © Publishing Technology. Article copyright remains with the publisher, society or author(s) as specified within the article.

• Terms and conditions
• Privacy policy
• Information for advertisers