Authors: Bradley, Elizabeth H.; Nallamothu, Brahmajee K.; Stern, Amy F.; Cherlin, Emily J.; Wang, Yongfei; Byrd, Jason R.; Linnander, Erika L.; Nazem, Alexander G.; Brush, John E.; Krumholz, Harlan M.

Source: Joint Commission Journal on Quality and Patient Safety, Volume 35, Number 2, February 2009 , pp. 93-99(7)

Publisher: Joint Commission Resources

Abstract:

Background: The Door-to-Balloon (D2B) Alliance is a collaborative effort of more than 900 hospitals aimed at improving D2B times for ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction. Although such collaborative efforts are increasingly used to promote improvement, little is known about the types of health care organizations that enroll and their motivations to participate.

Methods: To examine the types of hospitals enrolled and reasons for enrollment, a cross-sectional study was conducted of 915 D2B Alliance hospitals and 654 hospitals that did not join the D2B Alliance. Data were obtained from the American Hospital Association's Annual Survey of Hospitals and a Web-based survey completed by 797 enrolled hospitals (response rate, 87%). Chi-square statistics were used to examine statistical associations, and qualitative data analysis was used to characterize reported reasons for enrolling.

Results: Hospitals that enrolled in the D2B Alliance were significantly (p values < .05) more likely to be larger, non-profit (versus for-profit), and teaching (versus nonteaching) hospitals. Earlier-versus later-enrolling hospitals were more likely to have key recommended strategies already in place at the time of enrollment. Improving quality and "doing the right thing" were commonly reported reasons for enrolling; however, hospitals also reported improving market share, meeting regulatory and accreditation requirements, and enhancing reputation as primary reasons for joining.

Conclusions: The findings highlight the underlying goals of organizations to improve their position in the external environment—including economic, regulatory, accreditation, and professional environments. Designing quality improvement collaborative efforts to appeal to these goals may be an important strategy for enhancing participation and, in turn, increasing the uptake of evidence-based innovations.

Document Type: Research article

Publication date: 2009-02-01

More about this publication?

• Published monthly, The Joint Commission Journal on Quality and Patient Safety is a peer-reviewed publication dedicated to providing health professionals with the information they need to promote the quality and safety of health care. The Joint Commission Journal on Quality and Patient Safety invites original manuscripts on the development, adaptation, and/or implementation of innovative thinking, strategies, and practices in improving quality and safety in health care. Case studies, program or project reports, reports of new methodologies or new applications of methodologies, research studies on the effectiveness of improvement interventions, and commentaries on issues and practices are all considered.
  
  Also known as Joint Commission Journal on Quality Improvement and Joint Commission Journal on Quality and Safety
• Editorial Board
• Information for Authors
• Subscribe to this Title
• Information for Advertisers
• Reprints and Permissions
• Joint Commission Journal on Quality and Patient Safety - Author Index
• ingentaconnect is not responsible for the content or availability of external websites

Related content

• In this: publication
• By this: publisher
• In this Subject: Medicine ,  Public Health
• By this author: Bradley, Elizabeth H. ;  Nallamothu, Brahmajee K. ;  Stern, Amy F. ;  Cherlin, Emily J. ;  Wang, Yongfei ;  Byrd, Jason R. ;  Linnander, Erika L. ;  Nazem, Alexander G. ;  Brush, John E. ;  Krumholz, Harlan M.

Website © Publishing Technology. Article copyright remains with the publisher, society or author(s) as specified within the article.

• Terms and conditions
• Privacy policy
• Information for advertisers