Variation in Quality of Care Within Health Systems

Authors: Hines, Steve; Joshi, Maulik

Source: Joint Commission Journal on Quality and Patient Safety, Volume 34, Number 6, June 2008 , pp. 326-332(7)

Publisher: Joint Commission Resources

Key:
Free Content - Free Content
New Content - New Content
Subscribed Content - Subscribed Content
Free Trial Content - Free Trial Content

Abstract:

Background: Although many hospitals belong to health care systems, little is known about the quality of care provided by those systems, or whether characteristics of health care systems are related to the quality of care patients receive. Dimensions of the quality of care provided in 73 hospital systems were examined using hospital quality data publicly reported by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS). The hospital systems consisted of six or more acute care hospitals and represented 1,510 hospitals. The study was designed to determine whether these dimensions of system quality could be reliably measured, to describe how systems varied with respect to quality of care, and to explore system characteristics potentially related to care quality.

Methods: Data were made available by CMS for 19 indicators of care quality for pneumonia, surgical infection prevention, acute myocardial infarction (AMI), and congestive heart failure.

Results: At the system level, reliable measures (alphas > .70) were constructed for each of the four clinical areas, and these measures were combined into a single measure of quality (alpha = .85). Variability in system quality was substantial, ranging from 94% to 70% on the combined quality measure. On the clinical area measures, the smallest range was for AMI (99%-85%), whereas the largest was for surgical infection prevention (95%-54%). System ownership and system centralization were significant predictors of quality, accounting for 30% of variance in the combined quality measure. Geographic region, inclusion of teaching hospitals, and system size were unrelated to quality.

Discussion: Systems vary greatly in terms of quality of care in each of the four clinical areas, with for-profit and more decentralized systems appreciably lower in quality of care. System-level quality measures and data could be used to compare processes within systems and to drive improvement efforts.

Document Type: Research article

The full text electronic article is available for purchase. You will be able to download the full text electronic article after payment.

$20.00 plus tax

 

OR

Back to top

Key:
Free Content - Free Content
New Content - New Content
Subscribed Content - Subscribed Content
Free Trial Content - Free Trial Content
Page Help Click here for Page Help
Shopping cart
Tools
Sign in






Need to register?
Sign up here
Text size: A | A | A | A