Recruitment of Hospitals for a Safety Climate Study: Facilitators and Barriers
Abstract:Background: Despite increasing emphasis on safety culture assessment, little is known about the factors that affect hospitals' participation in such studies. Factors affecting recruitment of 30 Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) hospitals into a study to evaluate perceptions of safety culture, or safety "climate," were examined.
Methods: To minimize selection bias, hospitals were recruited that represented the spectrum of safety performance on the basis of Patient Safety Indicator scores. Invitations and additional mailings, informational conference calls, and personal contact with hospitals were used to encourage participation. Investigators worked closely with hospitals' key stakeholders to obtain support and buy-in for the study. Relationships among safety performance, organizational culture, and other hospital characteristics with hospitals' participation and ease of recruitment were examined. Findings were compared with those of a companion study in the non–VA setting.
Results: Despite attempts to optimize recruitment, it was necessary to contact more than 90 hospitals to obtain a 30-hospital sample. Having a more entrepreneurial culture (associated with risk-taking, innovation, and quality improvement) was significantly related to shorter recruitment time in VA and non–VA settings. Safety performance was significantly related to participation in the VA (that is, "better-performing" hospitals were more likely to be recruited than "lower-performing" hospitals), but not in the non–VA study, where recruitment was based on size and region.
Discussion: Researchers should recruit representative samples of hospitals based on measures of safety performance. Hospital selection bias could lead to erroneous findings, ultimately impeding efforts to improve safety within organizations.
Document Type: Research Article
Publication date: May 1, 2008
More about this publication?
- Published monthly, The Joint Commission Journal on Quality and Patient Safety is a peer-reviewed publication dedicated to providing health professionals with the information they need to promote the quality and safety of health care. The Joint Commission Journal on Quality and Patient Safety invites original manuscripts on the development, adaptation, and/or implementation of innovative thinking, strategies, and practices in improving quality and safety in health care. Case studies, program or project reports, reports of new methodologies or new applications of methodologies, research studies on the effectiveness of improvement interventions, and commentaries on issues and practices are all considered.
David W. Baker, MD, MPH, FACP, executive vice president for the Division of Healthcare Quality Evaluation at The Joint Commission, is the inaugural editor-in-chief of The Joint Commission Journal on Quality and Patient Safety.
Also known as Joint Commission Journal on Quality Improvement and Joint Commission Journal on Quality and Safety
- Editorial Board
- Information for Authors
- Subscribe to this Title
- Information for Advertisers
- Reprints and Permissions
- Ingenta Connect is not responsible for the content or availability of external websites