Enhanced Toileting Program Decreases Incontinence in Long Term Care
Abstract:Background: Incontinence is a common problem in long term care. In March 2003, in reviewing its performance on the Minimum Data Set (MDS 3.0) quality indicators, Sea View Hospital Rehabilitation Center and Home, a 304-bed long term care facility in Staten Island, New York, discovered it was 39% above the average of the state and national means for the incontinence indicators. In response, it initiated a facilitywide performance improvement project.
Methods: Processes identified in the action plan for the project, “Residents who trigger for occasional or frequent bowel and bladder incontinence on MDS will be assessed for an individualized toileting schedule,” included (1) revision of assessment documentation, which improved the initial assessment of continence, with an added reassessment process; (2) documentation of the toileting plan on the Patient Care Technician Assignment Card and the Activity of Daily Living Accountability Sheet; (3) adoption of toilet-assist devices; (4) hospitalwide in-service on incontinence and toileting; and (5) revision of the bowel and bladder incontinence policy.
Results: After implementation of the revised bowel and bladder incontinence assessment tool, the rate of incontinence without a toileting plan decreased—from 79% to 38%—and remained below the yearly mean.
Discussion: The new assessment processes made individualized planning possible and accurate. This initiative could be easily replicated because it requires resources that are basic to most long term care facilities.
Document Type: Research Article
Publication date: April 1, 2008
More about this publication?
- Published monthly, The Joint Commission Journal on Quality and Patient Safety is a peer-reviewed publication dedicated to providing health professionals with the information they need to promote the quality and safety of health care. The Joint Commission Journal on Quality and Patient Safety invites original manuscripts on the development, adaptation, and/or implementation of innovative thinking, strategies, and practices in improving quality and safety in health care. Case studies, program or project reports, reports of new methodologies or new applications of methodologies, research studies on the effectiveness of improvement interventions, and commentaries on issues and practices are all considered.
David W. Baker, MD, MPH, FACP, executive vice president for the Division of Healthcare Quality Evaluation at The Joint Commission, is the inaugural editor-in-chief of The Joint Commission Journal on Quality and Patient Safety.
Also known as Joint Commission Journal on Quality Improvement and Joint Commission Journal on Quality and Safety
- Editorial Board
- Information for Authors
- Subscribe to this Title
- Information for Advertisers
- Reprints and Permissions
- Ingenta Connect is not responsible for the content or availability of external websites