Improving Outcomes in Pediatric Procedural Sedation

$20.00 plus tax (Refund Policy)

Buy Article:

Abstract:

Background: In Fall 2003, Chris Evert Children's Hospital (CECH; Fort Lauderdale, Florida) exclusively used chloral hydrate for moderate sedation. As procedures became longer and more complex, pentobarbital became the primary sedative used. Yet children receiving pentobarbital were awakening during the procedure from paradoxical drug reactions or insufficient sedation. In 2003, the failed sedation rate was 12.29%—more than six times the national benchmark of 2%.

Methods: The pediatric sedation team created a pediatric sedation protocol, which reflected the designation of an a2-adrenergic agonist, dexmedetomidine (dex), as the drug of choice and spearheaded a variety of performance improvement changes, including creation of a stand-alone eight-bed sedation unit to accommodate the registration process and pre-assessment and postprocedure monitoring and to include the parent in the treatment continuum.

Results: Following the implementation of the new protocol in 2003, the failed sedation rate for children undergoing various diagnostic and therapeutic procedures decreased from 12.29% to 1.63% in 2004, 0.19% in 2005, and 0.28% in 2006; in 2007 the rate was 0.72%—reflecting an average 98% reduction in the failed sedation rate.

Discussion: The continued improvement and success in pediatric sedation over time indicates that the protocol has sustained benefits and lasting value.

Document Type: Research Article

Publication date: April 1, 2008

More about this publication?
  • Published monthly, The Joint Commission Journal on Quality and Patient Safety is a peer-reviewed publication dedicated to providing health professionals with the information they need to promote the quality and safety of health care. The Joint Commission Journal on Quality and Patient Safety invites original manuscripts on the development, adaptation, and/or implementation of innovative thinking, strategies, and practices in improving quality and safety in health care. Case studies, program or project reports, reports of new methodologies or new applications of methodologies, research studies on the effectiveness of improvement interventions, and commentaries on issues and practices are all considered.

    Also known as Joint Commission Journal on Quality Improvement and Joint Commission Journal on Quality and Safety
  • Editorial Board
  • Information for Authors
  • Subscribe to this Title
  • Information for Advertisers
  • Reprints and Permissions
  • Index
  • ingentaconnect is not responsible for the content or availability of external websites
Related content

Tools

Favourites

Share Content

Access Key

Free Content
Free content
New Content
New content
Open Access Content
Open access content
Subscribed Content
Subscribed content
Free Trial Content
Free trial content
Cookie Policy
X
Cookie Policy
ingentaconnect website makes use of cookies so as to keep track of data that you have filled in. I am Happy with this Find out more