Background: In Fall 2003, Chris Evert Children's Hospital (CECH; Fort Lauderdale, Florida) exclusively used chloral hydrate for moderate sedation. As procedures became longer and more complex, pentobarbital became the primary sedative used. Yet children receiving pentobarbital were awakening during the procedure from paradoxical drug reactions or insufficient sedation. In 2003, the failed sedation rate was 12.29%—more than six times the national benchmark of 2%. Methods: The pediatric sedation team created a pediatric sedation protocol, which reflected the designation of an a2-adrenergic agonist, dexmedetomidine (dex), as the drug of choice and spearheaded a variety of performance improvement changes, including creation of a stand-alone eight-bed sedation unit to accommodate the registration process and pre-assessment and postprocedure monitoring and to include the parent in the treatment continuum. Results: Following the implementation of the new protocol in 2003, the failed sedation rate for children undergoing various diagnostic and therapeutic procedures decreased from 12.29% to 1.63% in 2004, 0.19% in 2005, and 0.28% in 2006; in 2007 the rate was 0.72%—reflecting an average 98% reduction in the failed sedation rate. Discussion: The continued improvement and success in pediatric sedation over time indicates that the protocol has sustained benefits and lasting value.
Document Type: Research Article
Publication date: April 1, 2008
More about this publication?
Published monthly, The Joint Commission Journal on Quality and Patient Safety is a peer-reviewed publication dedicated to providing health professionals with the information they need to promote the quality and safety of health care. The Joint Commission Journal on Quality and Patient Safety invites original manuscripts on the development, adaptation, and/or implementation of innovative thinking, strategies, and practices in improving quality and safety in health care. Case studies, program or project reports, reports of new methodologies or new applications of methodologies, research studies on the effectiveness of improvement interventions, and commentaries on issues and practices are all considered.
Also known as Joint Commission Journal on Quality Improvement and Joint Commission Journal on Quality and Safety