Clinical Inertia: A Common Barrier to Changing Provider Prescribing Behavior

Authors: Roumie, Christianne L.; Elasy, Tom; Wallston, Kenneth A.; Pratt, Susan; Greevy, Robert A.; Liu, Xulei; Alvarez, Vincent; Dittus, Robert S.; Speroff, Theodore

Source: Joint Commission Journal on Quality and Patient Safety, Volume 33, Number 5, May 2007 , pp. 277-285(9)

Publisher: Joint Commission Resources

Buy & download fulltext article:

Price: $20.00 plus tax (Refund Policy)

Abstract:

Background: A cross-sectional content analysis nested within a randomized, controlled trial was conducted to collect information on provider responses to computer alerts regarding guideline recommendations for patients with suboptimal hypertension care.

Methods: Participants were providers who cared for 1,017 patients with uncontrolled hypertension on a single antihypertensive agent within Veterans Affairs primary care clinics. All reasons for action or inaction were sorted into a framework to explain the variation in guideline adaptation.

Results: The 184 negative provider responses to computer alerts contained explanations for not changing patient treatment; 76 responses to the alerts were positive, that is, the provider was going to make a change in antihypertensive regimen. The negative responses were categorized as: inertia of practice (66%), lack of agreement with specific guidelines (5%), patient-based factors (17%), environmental factors (10%), and lack of knowledge (2%). Most of the 135 providers classified as inertia of practice indicated, "Continue current medications and I will discuss at the next visit." The median number of days until the next visit was 45 days (interquartile range, 29 to 78 days).

Discussion: Clinical inertia was the primary reason for failing to engage in otherwise indicated treatment change in a subgroup of patients. A framework was provided as a taxonomy for classification of provider barriers.

Document Type: Research article

Publication date: 2007-05-01

More about this publication?

Published monthly, The Joint Commission Journal on Quality and Patient Safety is a peer-reviewed publication dedicated to providing health professionals with the information they need to promote the quality and safety of health care. The Joint Commission Journal on Quality and Patient Safety invites original manuscripts on the development, adaptation, and/or implementation of innovative thinking, strategies, and practices in improving quality and safety in health care. Case studies, program or project reports, reports of new methodologies or new applications of methodologies, research studies on the effectiveness of improvement interventions, and commentaries on issues and practices are all considered.

Also known as Joint Commission Journal on Quality Improvement and Joint Commission Journal on Quality and Safety
Editorial Board
Information for Authors
Subscribe to this Title
Information for Advertisers
Reprints and Permissions
Joint Commission Journal on Quality and Patient Safety - Author Index
ingentaconnect is not responsible for the content or availability of external websites

Clinical Inertia: A Common Barrier to Changing Provider Prescribing Behavior

Buy & download fulltext article:

Tools

Key

Text size:

Useful pages