Assessing Quality in Obstetrical Care: Development of Standardized Measures
Authors: Mann, Susan; Pratt, Stephen; Gluck, Paul; Nielsen, Peter; Risser, Daniel; Greenberg, Penny; Marcus, Ronald; Goldman, Marlene; Shapiro, David; Pearlman, Mark; Sachs, Benjamin
Source: Joint Commission Journal on Quality and Patient Safety, Volume 32, Number 9, September 2006 , pp. 497-505(9)
Publisher: Joint Commission Resources
Abstract:Background: No nationally accepted set of quality indicators exists in obstetrics. A set of 10 outcome measures and three quality improvement tools was developed as part of a study evaluating the effects of teamwork on obstetric care in 15 institutions and > 28,000 patients. Each outcome was assigned a severity weighting score.
Measures: Three new obstetrical quality improvement outcome tools were developed. The Adverse Outcome Index (AOI) is the percent of deliveries with one or more adverse events. The average AOI during the pre-implementation data collection period of the team-work study was 9.2% (range, 5.9%–16.6%). The Weighted Adverse Outcome Score (WAOS) describes the adverse event score per delivery. It is the sum of the points assigned to cases with adverse outcomes divided by the number of deliveries. The average WAOS for the pre-implementation period was 3 points (range, 1.0–6.0). The Severity Index (SI) describes the severity of the outcomes. It is the sum of the adverse outcome scores divided by the number of deliveries with an identified adverse outcome. The average SI for the pre-implementation period was 31 points (range, 16–49).
Discussion: The outcome measures and the AOI, WAOS, and SI can be used to benchmark ongoing care within and among organizations. These tools may be useful nationally for determining quality obstetric care.
Document Type: Research Article
Publication date: September 1, 2006
- Published monthly, The Joint Commission Journal on Quality and Patient Safety is a peer-reviewed publication dedicated to providing health professionals with the information they need to promote the quality and safety of health care. The Joint Commission Journal on Quality and Patient Safety invites original manuscripts on the development, adaptation, and/or implementation of innovative thinking, strategies, and practices in improving quality and safety in health care. Case studies, program or project reports, reports of new methodologies or new applications of methodologies, research studies on the effectiveness of improvement interventions, and commentaries on issues and practices are all considered.
Also known as Joint Commission Journal on Quality Improvement and Joint Commission Journal on Quality and Safety
- Editorial Board
- Information for Authors
- Subscribe to this Title
- Information for Advertisers
- Reprints and Permissions
- ingentaconnect is not responsible for the content or availability of external websites