Using HFMEA to Assess Potential for Patient Harm from Tubing Misconnections
Abstract:Background: Reported cases of tubing misconnections and other tubing errors prompted Columbus Children's Hospital to study their potential for harm in its patient population. A Health Failure Mode and Effects Analysis (HFMEA) was conducted in October 2004 to determine the risks inherent in the use and labeling of various enteral, parenteral, and other tubing types in patient care and the potential for patient harm.
Methods: An assessment of the practice culture revealed considerable variability among nurses and respiratory therapists within and between units. Work on an HFMEA culminated in recommendations of risk reduction strategies. These included standardizing the process of labeling of tubing throughout the organization, developing an online pictorial catalog to list available tubing supplies with all aliases used by staff, and conducting an inventory of all supplies to identify products that need to be purchased or discontinued. Three groups are working on implementing each of the recommendations.
Results: Most of the results already realized occurred in labeling of tubing. The pediatric intensive care unit labels all tubing with infused medications 85% of the time; tubings inserted during surgery or in interventional radiology are labeled 53% and 93% of the time. Pocket-size cards with printed labels were tested in three units.
Discussion: This proactive risk assessment project has identified failure modes and possible causes and solutions; several recommendations have been implemented. No tubing misconnections have been reported.
Document Type: Research Article
Publication date: July 1, 2006
More about this publication?
- Published monthly, The Joint Commission Journal on Quality and Patient Safety is a peer-reviewed publication dedicated to providing health professionals with the information they need to promote the quality and safety of health care. The Joint Commission Journal on Quality and Patient Safety invites original manuscripts on the development, adaptation, and/or implementation of innovative thinking, strategies, and practices in improving quality and safety in health care. Case studies, program or project reports, reports of new methodologies or new applications of methodologies, research studies on the effectiveness of improvement interventions, and commentaries on issues and practices are all considered.
David W. Baker, MD, MPH, FACP, executive vice president for the Division of Healthcare Quality Evaluation at The Joint Commission, is the inaugural editor-in-chief of The Joint Commission Journal on Quality and Patient Safety.
Also known as Joint Commission Journal on Quality Improvement and Joint Commission Journal on Quality and Safety
- Editorial Board
- Information for Authors
- Subscribe to this Title
- Information for Advertisers
- Reprints and Permissions
- Ingenta Connect is not responsible for the content or availability of external websites