Monitoring Patient Safety in Health Care: Building the Case for Surrogate Measures
Abstract:Background: Objective measurements are notably lacking for many adverse events in health care. A new approach to monitoring such events is based on the experience in measuring hospital-associated infections.
Developing Objective and Universal Measures: An essential tenet of the current goal of surveillance—focusing only on rigorously confirmed adverse events—is neither necessary nor achievable across the entire health care system. Efforts should be directed instead to creating objective measures of quality of care and of outcomes that can be used by all health care facilities. Adopting objective measures would be easier if health care was open to surrogate measures of important outcomes.
Surrogate measures of interest for infection surveillance are used to identify objective, readily ascertained events that are sufficiently correlated with infections to provide useful information about organizations' infection rates. For example, the surgical site infection rate following coronary artery bypass appears to correlate closely enough with the proportion of patients who receive extended courses of inpatient antibiotics to be a useful indicator of a hospital's outcomes for the procedure.
Conclusion: Developing clinically relevant process or surrogate measures that clinicians would use to improve patient outcomes is essential. These measures could be relevant not only to hospital-acquired infections but other health care-related adverse events that are relatively common yet require substantial resources to identify.
Document Type: Miscellaneous
Publication date: February 1, 2006
More about this publication?
- Published monthly, The Joint Commission Journal on Quality and Patient Safety is a peer-reviewed publication dedicated to providing health professionals with the information they need to promote the quality and safety of health care. The Joint Commission Journal on Quality and Patient Safety invites original manuscripts on the development, adaptation, and/or implementation of innovative thinking, strategies, and practices in improving quality and safety in health care. Case studies, program or project reports, reports of new methodologies or new applications of methodologies, research studies on the effectiveness of improvement interventions, and commentaries on issues and practices are all considered.
David W. Baker, MD, MPH, FACP, executive vice president for the Division of Healthcare Quality Evaluation at The Joint Commission, is the inaugural editor-in-chief of The Joint Commission Journal on Quality and Patient Safety.
Also known as Joint Commission Journal on Quality Improvement and Joint Commission Journal on Quality and Safety
- Editorial Board
- Information for Authors
- Subscribe to this Title
- Information for Advertisers
- Reprints and Permissions
- Ingenta Connect is not responsible for the content or availability of external websites