Skip to main content

Barriers to Implementing a Surgical Beta-Blocker Protocol

Buy Article:

$20.00 plus tax (Refund Policy)

Abstract:

Background: Experience with a quality improvement (QI) program undertaken to increase the use of beta-adrenergic blockade in at-risk patients at both a major academic medical center and a community hospital suggests barriers to implementation.

Methods: A retrospective and prospective cohort study was performed to establish the incidence and effectiveness of beta-blockade use pre- and postimplementation of a standardized screening tool and a major education program as part of a QI project. Data gathering involved a baseline phase pre-intervention; 6 weeks postintervention; and 3–6 months postintervention.

Results: During phase I (baseline) 56% of eligible patients received beta-blockers, but targeted measures (a pre-induction heart rate < 70 or a systolic blood pressure [BP] < 110 mmHg) were achieved in only 11% of patients. Phase II saw a significant overall increase in beta-blocker administration (79%) and efficacy (50%). However, during phase III (3–6 months postimplementation), the rate of beta-blocker administration fell to 61% overall, while overall efficacy remained stable at 52%. Significant differences between the academic and community hospitals were observed throughout the study.

Conclusion: Implementation of a quality program for beta-blockade is significantly affected by the presence or absence of ongoing physician and staff education beyond the study period.

Document Type: Research Article

Publication date: November 1, 2005

More about this publication?
  • Published monthly, The Joint Commission Journal on Quality and Patient Safety is a peer-reviewed publication dedicated to providing health professionals with the information they need to promote the quality and safety of health care. The Joint Commission Journal on Quality and Patient Safety invites original manuscripts on the development, adaptation, and/or implementation of innovative thinking, strategies, and practices in improving quality and safety in health care. Case studies, program or project reports, reports of new methodologies or new applications of methodologies, research studies on the effectiveness of improvement interventions, and commentaries on issues and practices are all considered.

    Also known as Joint Commission Journal on Quality Improvement and Joint Commission Journal on Quality and Safety
  • Editorial Board
  • Information for Authors
  • Subscribe to this Title
  • Information for Advertisers
  • Reprints and Permissions
  • Index
  • ingentaconnect is not responsible for the content or availability of external websites
jcaho/jcjqs/2005/00000031/00000011/art00005
dcterms_title,dcterms_description,pub_keyword
6
5
20
40
5

Access Key

Free Content
Free content
New Content
New content
Open Access Content
Open access content
Subscribed Content
Subscribed content
Free Trial Content
Free trial content
Cookie Policy
X
Cookie Policy
ingentaconnect website makes use of cookies so as to keep track of data that you have filled in. I am Happy with this Find out more