Background: In January 2005, the U.S. Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ) released the congressionally mandated reports on the United States health care system—the 2004 National Healthcare Quality and Disparities Reports (NHQR and NHDR). They are intended to summarize the current state of the science of health care quality and disparities for a broad audience, including providers, consumers, researchers, and policy makers. Balancing the Health Care Scorecards: The NHQR and NHDR are designed as balanced scorecards, yet measure imbalance is evident with respect to relative attention to the quality dimensions, condition/clinical areas, and priority population. For example, heart disease and nursing home/home health each represent more than 20 measures of the total of 179 measures, whereas mental health and HIV/AIDS care are tracked with a total of six. Using the Scorecard for Quality Improvement (QI): The measures making up the scorecards are derived directly from current national initiatives aimed at improving specific performance measures in hospitals, nursing homes, and home health agencies, which facilitates performance benchmarking at different levels of the health care system. Conclusion: Much work remains to be done if these reports are to be used to their fullest potential as balanced scorecards for the United States.
Document Type: Research Article
Publication date: November 1, 2005
More about this publication?
Published monthly, The Joint Commission Journal on Quality and Patient Safety is a peer-reviewed publication dedicated to providing health professionals with the information they need to promote the quality and safety of health care. The Joint Commission Journal on Quality and Patient Safety invites original manuscripts on the development, adaptation, and/or implementation of innovative thinking, strategies, and practices in improving quality and safety in health care. Case studies, program or project reports, reports of new methodologies or new applications of methodologies, research studies on the effectiveness of improvement interventions, and commentaries on issues and practices are all considered.
Also known as Joint Commission Journal on Quality Improvement and Joint Commission Journal on Quality and Safety