Background: Depression's high prevalence and large amount of potentially modifiable morbidity make it an excellent candidate for quality improvement (QI) techniques. Yet there is little evidence on how to promote adherence to evidence-based guidelines. A locally run research and QI project that was part of a larger National Institute of Mental Health–funded study to implement depression guidelines was implemented by a primary care team at a Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) ambulatory care center in 1997 and 1998. Development of the QI Intervention: The plan to improve screening and recognition entailed systematically screening all patients attending the primary care clinic; sending computer reminders to clerical staff, nursing assistants, and primary care providers; and auditing team performance with monthly feedback. Results: Once the intervention was in place, nearly all patients were screened. The primary care provider documented the assessment of whether a patient was depressed for nearly all patients who screened positive. Few resources were needed to maintain the project once it was implemented. Discussion: An evidence-based QI intervention led to profound and lasting changes in primary care providers' recognition of depression or depressive symptoms. The QI implementation continued for one year after the intervention's end, but a new VA computerized medical record system uses similar computer-generated reminders.
Document Type: Research Article
Publication date: February 1, 2004
More about this publication?
Published monthly, The Joint Commission Journal on Quality and Patient Safety is a peer-reviewed publication dedicated to providing health professionals with the information they need to promote the quality and safety of health care. The Joint Commission Journal on Quality and Patient Safety invites original manuscripts on the development, adaptation, and/or implementation of innovative thinking, strategies, and practices in improving quality and safety in health care. Case studies, program or project reports, reports of new methodologies or new applications of methodologies, research studies on the effectiveness of improvement interventions, and commentaries on issues and practices are all considered.
Also known as Joint Commission Journal on Quality Improvement and Joint Commission Journal on Quality and Safety