Skip to main content

What Does It Take? A Case Study of Radical Change Toward Patient Safety

Buy Article:

$20.00 plus tax (Refund Policy)

Abstract:

Background: Adopting a human factors engineering approach to patient safety requires a radical behavioral shift from "blame and shame," which emphasizes further training, to systems thinking, which also emphasizes improved system design. A medical device manufacturer appeared to initiate this radical shift after exhibiting the traditional approach for years.

Methodology: The research focused on a patient-controlled analgesia device. A qualitative case study methodology was used to study events in the period from the device's introduction (1988) until the start of the behavioral change (May 2001). Data on 50 relevant events were analyzed. The tabular summary was analyzed for evidence of the prerequisites predicted by punctuated equilibrium theory, and the graphical time line was analyzed for evidence of vertical alignment across levels.

Results: Radical behavioral change was preceded by a critical 9.5-month period with three characteristics: new corporate leadership, perceived poor corporate performance, and aligned disruptions occurring within a relatively short time at almost every level in the external environment in which the company operated.

Discussion: These findings are consistent with punctuated equilibrium theory, according to which organizations can experience long periods of resistance to change followed by fast revolutionary change (approximately two years). The findings also have implications for when and how to introduce patient safety policy interventions to "tilt the playing field" and thereby increase the likelihoood that such reforms will succeed.

Document Type: Research Article

Publication date: 2003-11-01

More about this publication?
  • Published monthly, The Joint Commission Journal on Quality and Patient Safety is a peer-reviewed publication dedicated to providing health professionals with the information they need to promote the quality and safety of health care. The Joint Commission Journal on Quality and Patient Safety invites original manuscripts on the development, adaptation, and/or implementation of innovative thinking, strategies, and practices in improving quality and safety in health care. Case studies, program or project reports, reports of new methodologies or new applications of methodologies, research studies on the effectiveness of improvement interventions, and commentaries on issues and practices are all considered.

    David W. Baker, MD, MPH, FACP, executive vice president for the Division of Healthcare Quality Evaluation at The Joint Commission, is the inaugural editor-in-chief of The Joint Commission Journal on Quality and Patient Safety.

    Also known as Joint Commission Journal on Quality Improvement and Joint Commission Journal on Quality and Safety
  • Editorial Board
  • Information for Authors
  • Subscribe to this Title
  • Information for Advertisers
  • Reprints and Permissions
  • Index
  • Ingenta Connect is not responsible for the content or availability of external websites
  • Access Key
  • Free ContentFree content
  • Partial Free ContentPartial Free content
  • New ContentNew content
  • Open Access ContentOpen access content
  • Partial Open Access ContentPartial Open access content
  • Subscribed ContentSubscribed content
  • Partial Subscribed ContentPartial Subscribed content
  • Free Trial ContentFree trial content
Cookie Policy
X
Cookie Policy
Ingenta Connect website makes use of cookies so as to keep track of data that you have filled in. I am Happy with this Find out more