What Are Hospitals Doing to Increase Beta-Blocker Use?
Abstract:Background: Despite the many proposed methods for improving quality, little is known about which methods are being applied in practice across the United States or their perceived effectiveness.
Methods: A descriptive, cross-sectional analysis of data from a telephone survey of quality improvement staff in 234 randomly selected hospitals participating in the National Registry of Myocardial Infarction was conducted to examine the prevalence and perceived effectiveness of various quality improvement interventions directed at increasing beta-blocker use after acute myocardial infarction.
Results: The mean and median number of quality improvement interventions directed at beta-blocker use in the past 4 years was 5.0 per hospital. The most commonly reported effort was performance reporting about beta-blocker use (87.9%), although only 26.7% used physician-specific performance reporting. More than half the hospitals implemented clinical pathways (58.1%), standing orders (56.8%), or care coordinators (50.4%). Care coordinators (63.4%) and computer support systems (61.6%) were most frequently rated as "very effective." Clinical pathways (24.2%), counseling physicians who had poor performance (26.9%), and reminder forms (23.0%) were most frequently rated as not effective.
Conclusions: Substantial variation in the types of quality improvement efforts implemented to increase beta-blocker use and perceived effectiveness were evident.
Document Type: Research Article
Publication date: August 1, 2003
More about this publication?
- Published monthly, The Joint Commission Journal on Quality and Patient Safety is a peer-reviewed publication dedicated to providing health professionals with the information they need to promote the quality and safety of health care. The Joint Commission Journal on Quality and Patient Safety invites original manuscripts on the development, adaptation, and/or implementation of innovative thinking, strategies, and practices in improving quality and safety in health care. Case studies, program or project reports, reports of new methodologies or new applications of methodologies, research studies on the effectiveness of improvement interventions, and commentaries on issues and practices are all considered.
David W. Baker, MD, MPH, FACP, executive vice president for the Division of Healthcare Quality Evaluation at The Joint Commission, is the inaugural editor-in-chief of The Joint Commission Journal on Quality and Patient Safety.
Also known as Joint Commission Journal on Quality Improvement and Joint Commission Journal on Quality and Safety
- Editorial Board
- Information for Authors
- Subscribe to this Title
- Information for Advertisers
- Reprints and Permissions
- Ingenta Connect is not responsible for the content or availability of external websites