Background: Several acute myocardial infarction (MI) guidelines and policy statements have been developed, but compliance rates are suboptimal. The cardiology section at Gundersen Lutheran Medical Center (La Crosse, Wisconsin) used a systemwide approach to enhance compliance with guidelines. Methods and results: Data were collected prospectively for a 4-year period (May 15, 1995–May 15, 1999) for all patients presenting with acute MI. In 1995 a multidisciplinary team developed protocols for each phase of MI management and designed clinical care paths with builtin accountability. The initiative resulted in improvements in all phases of acute MI care and met the benchmark recommendations in mean time to electrocardiogram, thrombolytic therapy, and aspirin and beta-blocker administration. Rates of prescriptions for secondary prevention were 92% for aspirin and beta-blocker and 97% for smoking cessation education at 4 years. Summary: The care path for acute MI involved multiple disciplines and empowerment of nonspecialists and nonphysician practitioners during development and implementation, as well as continual education and retraining. The care path led to several improvements in performance scores. These findings indicate that the recommendations as set forth in the American College of Cardiology (ACC) and the American Heart Association (AHA) guidelines for managing acute MI are realistic and achievable, and they do not require additional resources.
Document Type: Research Article
Publication date: May 1, 2003
More about this publication?
Published monthly, The Joint Commission Journal on Quality and Patient Safety is a peer-reviewed publication dedicated to providing health professionals with the information they need to promote the quality and safety of health care. The Joint Commission Journal on Quality and Patient Safety invites original manuscripts on the development, adaptation, and/or implementation of innovative thinking, strategies, and practices in improving quality and safety in health care. Case studies, program or project reports, reports of new methodologies or new applications of methodologies, research studies on the effectiveness of improvement interventions, and commentaries on issues and practices are all considered.
Also known as Joint Commission Journal on Quality Improvement and Joint Commission Journal on Quality and Safety