Improving Quality of Vascular Access Care for Hemodialysis Patients
Abstract:Background: Because quality of care for patients with end-stage renal disease (ESRD) has improved, they require long-term vascular access for hemodialysis. Construction of a native vein arteriovenous fistula (AVF) on the arm is considered best practice; a prosthetic graft (PG) AVF on the arm is a good alternative, although insertion of a central venous catheter (CVC), the third choice, is sometimes necessary. A quality improvement project was initiated at the dialysis unit of Rijnland Hospital (The Netherlands) to improve quality of vascular access care.
Methods: Seventy-four patients were treated from January 2001 through June 2002. The list of preferred access operations was adapted from evidence-based guidelines. The percentages of CVCs and PGs were chosen as quality indicators.
Results: Twelve of 19 patients (34%) appeared to be using CVCs unnecessarily. Actions were taken, and the CVC indicator decreased by 11%. The PG indicator decreased gradually from 24% to 8%.
Discussion: Reductions in the use of CVCs and PGs suggest that the vascular access improvement project resulted in improvement of long-term vascular access for hemodialysis patients. A considerable decrease in the use of PGs and CVCs was achieved in 2001. However, a decrease of CVCs to <20% has still not been realized, perhaps because new hemodialysis patients referred to the dialysis unit have already had CVCs inserted.
Summary and conclusion: Considerable improvement, as reflected in the number of hemodialysis patients with CVCs or PGs, can be achieved with a minimum of costs.
Document Type: Research Article
Publication date: April 1, 2003
More about this publication?
- Published monthly, The Joint Commission Journal on Quality and Patient Safety is a peer-reviewed publication dedicated to providing health professionals with the information they need to promote the quality and safety of health care. The Joint Commission Journal on Quality and Patient Safety invites original manuscripts on the development, adaptation, and/or implementation of innovative thinking, strategies, and practices in improving quality and safety in health care. Case studies, program or project reports, reports of new methodologies or new applications of methodologies, research studies on the effectiveness of improvement interventions, and commentaries on issues and practices are all considered.
David W. Baker, MD, MPH, FACP, executive vice president for the Division of Healthcare Quality Evaluation at The Joint Commission, is the inaugural editor-in-chief of The Joint Commission Journal on Quality and Patient Safety.
Also known as Joint Commission Journal on Quality Improvement and Joint Commission Journal on Quality and Safety
- Editorial Board
- Information for Authors
- Subscribe to this Title
- Information for Advertisers
- Reprints and Permissions
- Ingenta Connect is not responsible for the content or availability of external websites