Soliciting Patient Complaints to Improve Performance
Abstract:Background: A study was conducted in 2000 to describe service quality problems in a large tertiary care teaching hospital and evaluate the effect of a pre-discharge program for active complaint surveillance and resolution on patient satisfaction.
Methods: The pre–post intervention study with temporal controls was conducted at a tertiary care teaching hospital in St Louis. Eighty-four percent (1,023 of 1,218) of patients admitted to a general medical unit between October 2, 2000, and December 22, 2000, were interviewed by a patient advocate to identify and address patient complaints about service quality. Patient satisfaction was measured, using a validated instrument administered by telephone interview 7–10 days after discharge.
Results: The advocate completed 1,233 patient interviews and received 695 complaints about service quality. Half of the complaints concerned local unit care, most frequently delays in response to patient requests. Patients also complained about food, delays in admission and discharge, and inadequate communication about procedures. Concurrently, the hospital's formal reporting system received 12 complaints. Patient satisfaction scores were unchanged during the intervention.
Discussion: Active surveillance using predischarge patient interviews by a patient advocate identified many local and systemwide service quality problems in a large tertiary care teaching hospital that needed to be addressed to improve the quality of patient care. However, patient satisfaction scores were unchanged.
Document Type: Research Article
Publication date: 2003-03-01
More about this publication?
- Published monthly, The Joint Commission Journal on Quality and Patient Safety is a peer-reviewed publication dedicated to providing health professionals with the information they need to promote the quality and safety of health care. The Joint Commission Journal on Quality and Patient Safety invites original manuscripts on the development, adaptation, and/or implementation of innovative thinking, strategies, and practices in improving quality and safety in health care. Case studies, program or project reports, reports of new methodologies or new applications of methodologies, research studies on the effectiveness of improvement interventions, and commentaries on issues and practices are all considered.
David W. Baker, MD, MPH, FACP, executive vice president for the Division of Healthcare Quality Evaluation at The Joint Commission, is the inaugural editor-in-chief of The Joint Commission Journal on Quality and Patient Safety.
Also known as Joint Commission Journal on Quality Improvement and Joint Commission Journal on Quality and Safety
- Editorial Board
- Information for Authors
- Subscribe to this Title
- Information for Advertisers
- Reprints and Permissions
- Ingenta Connect is not responsible for the content or availability of external websites