Centralized Oversight for Clinical Performance Improvement: A Pilot Initiative at the Lexington VAMC
Abstract:Background: In July 2000 the Lexington Veterans Affairs Medical Center (Lexington, Ky) centralized oversight of clinical performance improvement (CPI) activities by creating an office of clinical operations (OCO) to improve patient care and operational efficiency. The OCO was designed to eliminate redundancy of effort, correct resource underuse and overuse, and improve the communication of change initiatives and successes. Before 2000 no formal process existed for creating interdisciplinary CPI teams. Lack of organizational oversight for CPI activities had also led to duplication of effort, mixed accountability, and difficulty in remaining focused on organizational goals.
Creating the OCO: OCO staff have led and facilitated numerous projects, all of which involved interdisciplinary teams consisting of physician and nurse leaders, users, and support staff. The OCO has also developed a utilization management plan for the entire medical center. The OCO formally interfaces with three major arenas of medical center operation: clinical processes, patient safety, and cost-efficiency.
Challenges and lessons learned: A major effort of OCO staff has been to learn about data availability and access and to determine how data can be used in a meaningful way to benefit CPI project teams. The creation of the OCO precipitated the typical cultural integration problems that are often encountered with the introduction of new organizational entities that lack existing turf.
Document Type: Research Article
Publication date: February 1, 2003
More about this publication?
- Published monthly, The Joint Commission Journal on Quality and Patient Safety is a peer-reviewed publication dedicated to providing health professionals with the information they need to promote the quality and safety of health care. The Joint Commission Journal on Quality and Patient Safety invites original manuscripts on the development, adaptation, and/or implementation of innovative thinking, strategies, and practices in improving quality and safety in health care. Case studies, program or project reports, reports of new methodologies or new applications of methodologies, research studies on the effectiveness of improvement interventions, and commentaries on issues and practices are all considered.
Also known as Joint Commission Journal on Quality Improvement and Joint Commission Journal on Quality and Safety
- Editorial Board
- Information for Authors
- Subscribe to this Title
- Information for Advertisers
- Reprints and Permissions
- ingentaconnect is not responsible for the content or availability of external websites