Skip to main content

The participial construction of Dolakhā Newar: Syntactic implications of an Asian converb

Buy Article:

$36.18 plus tax (Refund Policy)

Abstract:

The terms “(clause) chaining” and “converbal constructions” are used for the classification of similar types of clause linkage. Chaining is generally used for constructions which do not entail subordination, while converbs are defined as subordinate. In Dolakhā Newar adverbial and “participial” clauses are not syntactically distinct, but neither are they subordinate. I propose that the term “converb” be redefined as a clause-linkage strategy that subsumes adverbial clauses and clauses akin to the Dolakhāe “participial”, and that there be no requirement that converbs be either subordinate or adverbial. I provide an analysis of “case prolepsis”, the casemarking of an argument by a verb in a non-adjacent clause, and argue that this results from the participial construction applying at a distinct level of clause structure.

Document Type: Research Article

DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1075/sl.29.1.03gen

Affiliations: University of california, Santa Barbara

Publication date: January 1, 2005

More about this publication?
  • International Journal sponsored by the Foundation "Foundations of Language"
jbp/sl/2005/00000029/00000001/art00002
dcterms_title,dcterms_description,pub_keyword
6
5
20
40
5

Access Key

Free Content
Free content
New Content
New content
Open Access Content
Open access content
Subscribed Content
Subscribed content
Free Trial Content
Free trial content
Cookie Policy
X
Cookie Policy
Ingenta Connect website makes use of cookies so as to keep track of data that you have filled in. I am Happy with this Find out more