Metaphor and Symbol As Deviant' Language
This paper argues against recent claims by Sanders (1973) and Loewenberg (1975) that a theory of metaphor is not possible within existing linguistic theory and maintains that the notion of linguistic deviance is necessary not only to the definition of metaphor, but to the definition
of the literary symbol as well.
Document Type: Research Article
Publication date: 01 January 1979
- International Journal sponsored by the Foundation "Foundations of Language"
Receive new issue alert- Access Key
- Free content
- Partial Free content
- New content
- Open access content
- Partial Open access content
- Subscribed content
- Partial Subscribed content
- Free trial content