The nature of meaning: Brandom versus Chomsky

Author: Peregrin, Jaroslav¹

Source: Pragmatics & Cognition, Volume 13, Number 1, 2005 , pp. 39-57(19)

Publisher: John Benjamins Publishing Company

Key:

- Free Content

- New Content

- Subscribed Content

- Free Trial Content

Abstract:

Part of the philosophy of language of the 20th century is marked by a shift from the view of language as a tool of representing the world to its view as a means of interacting with the world. This shift is common to the later Wittgenstein, to pragmatists and neopragmatists including Brandom, and also to Chomsky and his school. The claim of the paper is that though the Chomskyans have offered an admirably elaborated theory of syntax adequate to the interactive view of language, they failed to develop a comparably adequate notion of semantics; and that it is Brandom‘s approach which, though prima facie much more speculative and much less scientific, paves the way to a semantic theory which an ‘interactivist’ should endorse.

Keywords: Generative grammar; inference; pragmatics; pragmatist turn; rule-following; semantics

Document Type: Research article

DOI: 10.1075/pc.13.1.05per

Affiliations: 1: Academy of Sciences of the Czech Republic

The full text electronic article is available for purchase. You will be able to download the full text electronic article after payment.

$38.49 plus tax Refund Policy