Skip to main content

Can iterated learning explain the emergence of graphical symbols?

Buy Article:

$36.18 plus tax (Refund Policy)

Abstract:

This paper contrasts two influential theoretical accounts of language change and evolution – Iterated Learning and Social Coordination. The contrast is based on an experiment that compares drawings produced with Garrod et al.'s (2007) 'pictionary' task with those produced in an Iterated Learning version of the same task. The main finding is that Iterated Learning does not lead to the systematic simplification and increased symbolicity of graphical signs produced in the standard interactive version of the task. A second finding is that Iterated Learning leads to less conceptual and structural alignment between participants than observed for those in the interactive condition. The paper concludes with a comparison of the two accounts in relation to how each promotes signs that are efficient, systematic and learnable.

Keywords: EVOLUTION OF COMMUNICATION; GRAPHICAL COMMUNICATION; INTERACTION; ITERATED LEARNING

Document Type: Research Article

DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1075/is.11.1.04gar

Publication date: March 1, 2010

More about this publication?
  • Social Behaviour and Communication in Biological and Artificial Systems
jbp/is/2010/00000011/00000001/art00003
dcterms_title,dcterms_description,pub_keyword
6
5
20
40
5

Access Key

Free Content
Free content
New Content
New content
Open Access Content
Open access content
Subscribed Content
Subscribed content
Free Trial Content
Free trial content
Cookie Policy
X
Cookie Policy
ingentaconnect website makes use of cookies so as to keep track of data that you have filled in. I am Happy with this Find out more